Page 846 - Logic News Today

Issues. his answers were constantly evasive and utterly unsatisfactory. it was deja vu in the first round of hearings when judge kavanaugh deliberately avoided talking about his views on roe, healthcare, presidential accountability, and more. there was no legal reason, rule or logic that prevented him from being clear and saying what he thought. he was evasive because he knows that his views are deeply at odds with the progress america has made over the last century of jurisprudence and at odds ...

My lifetime a public service, my hearing testimony was forceful and passionate. that is because i forcefully and passionately denied the allegations against me. he continued, i was very emotional last thursday. more so than i have ever been. i might have been too emotional at times. i know that my tone was sharp, i said a few things i should not have said. he did apologize once in the hearings. i hope that everyone can understand that i was there as a son, a husband, a dad, and i testified with ...

That guilt by accusation -- just doing what they do best today. feigning outrage. by the way, when did any of these people on the judiciary committee, the snowflakes on the floor of the senate being taken out all day, did they ever protested bill clinton like this? did they ever stand up for juanita broaddrick, kathleen willey, paula jones? oh, thats right, dianne feinstein, who recommended debra katz, debra katz did not believe in paula jones. it was only ten or 12: 12 minu. feigned, selective ...

And passionate. that is because i forcefully and passionately denied the allegations against me." he continued, "i was very emotional last thursday. more so than i have ever been. i might have been too emotional at times. i know that my tone was sharp, i said a few things i should not have said. he did apologize once in the hearings. i hope that everyone can understand that i was there as a son, a husband, a dad, and i testified with five people foremost in my mind. my mom, my dad, my wife, and ...

Weapons ban because they have not historically been banned. this logic means that as weapons become more advanced and more dangerous, they cannot be regulated at all. when i asked judge kavanaugh about his views that if a gun is in common use it cannot be regulated, he replied this way, and i quote. there are millions and millions and millions of semiautomatic rifles that are possessed. so that seemed to fit common use and not being a dangerous and unusual weapon, end quote. think about that. ju...

I asked him about all of those issues. his answers were constantly evasive and utterly unsatisfactory. it was deja vu all over again in the first round of hearings. when judge kavanaugh deliberately avoided talking about his views on roe, health care, presidential accountability, and more. there was no league reason, rule, or logic that prevented him from being clear and saying what he thought. he was evasive because he knows that his views are deeply at odds with the progress america has made o...

His views go well beyond simply being pro-gun. during a lecture at notre dame law school judge kavanaugh himself said he would be, quote, the first to acknowledge that most lower court judges have disagreed with his views on the second amendment. specifically, in district of columbia versus heller judge kavanaugh wrote in a dissenting opinion that unless guns were regulated either at the time of the constitution was written or traditionally throughout history, they cannot be regulated now. end q...

Issues. his answers were constantly evasive and utterly unsatisfactory. it was deja vu all over again in the first round of hearings when judge kavanaugh deliberately avoided talking about his views on roe, healthcare, presidential accountability and more. there was no legal reason, rule or logic that prevented him from being clear and saying what he thought. he was evasive because he knows that his views are deeply at odds with the progress america has made over the last century of jurisprudenc...

Weapons ban because they have not historically been banned. this logic means as weapons become more dangerous they cannot be regulated at all. when i asked judge kavanaugh about his views if a gun is in common use it cannot be reregulated he replied there are millions and millions and millions of semiautomatic rifles that are possessed, so that seemed to fit common use and not being a dangerous and unusual weapon. think about that. judge kavanaugh made up a new standard that had nothing to do wi...

>> no, they cant run on it and win on it. i dont think anybody thinks that. there is some anecdotal evidence that there is a boost in enthusiasm all over the right and in right ward leaning districts. the nrcc, the house republican campaign committee reported and we wrote in play book reported a massive increase in donations to a solicitation that they sent out. there is evidence that on the right there is some energy about this. i want to kind of dissect what the president has said here. the pr...