logiclogic al circuitous thing. what do you make of the ruling that does not apply to himself? it s a pretty interesting argument because the courts clearly say that there s no thing as absolute complete immunity. and bolton s lawyers are essentially say, yeah, but you didn t say also for issues of national security. because you didn t say that, this is controlling. there s an old supreme court says from 1992, that suggests that in cases of absolute immunity it doesn t exist. but it might exist in issues of national security hypothetically. it doesn t go so far as to say it doesn t exist. but it say crack in the armor of this. on the whole, however, if i were a betting person, i would say that michael bolton s team will eventually lose this battle.