bragg s case saying it could amount to a mere record-keeping infraction. here with reaction, legal analyst and author of the book the trial of the censcentury g jarrett and alan dershowitz. we all heard the statement you can indict a ham sandwich. there s a reason for that. the main reason is the grand jurors do not hear from the defense. the rules of evidence do not apply. those that would apply at a trial do not apply in a grand jury room. you can have hearsay evidence brought into a grand jury proceeding. you row this column. let s talk about the case and your analysis. yeah, look, i think the first thing that the defense team, trump s team will do is file a motion to dismiss. arguable that this looney tunes
that this looney tunes legal theory isn t supported by the law. bfalsifying business records, which is a misdemeanor, cannot be elevated to a felony unless you can show that it was concealing a state crime, not a federal crime. but wait, this was a federal election. so state campaign finance doesn t apply, which is why p i think bragge is now pointinggo to the federal campaign financee . but wait again, he can t do that either because he s ae local prosecutors. state prosecutors can only bring casess based on stae crimes.so so i think a motion to dismissso will be made. if it is not granted, you cangre expectd, trump s team to file an interlocutory appeal to a higher court because alvin bragg legally is trying to jam a square peg into a round hole and it won t fit. f