himself is sitting for a deposition is meaningful, it would seem. it seems like there is a case to be made that he was calling the shots here, that he knew these lies were going to be broadcast, and indeed, he wanted them to be. it s so meaningful that, typically, you would see companies like fox settling these cases before the chairman s ever deposed. the fact that he sat for two days of depositions tells you how far along this case is, and what kind of evidence that dominion has amassed against fox. to give you an idea of how serious it is, sean hannity has been back for two depositions. the first one was not enough. dominion more evidence of his possible knowing that they were spreading falsehoods on the air. janine pirro also has been back for a second deposition. suzanne scott, the ceo of fox news, was also called back for a second deposition. but ultimately, that didn t
reproductive autonomy and freedom is not the language in the state constitutions and through the courts. south carolina, supreme court, just recently recognized the right to abortion in south carolina under its constitution and its right to privacy. so, two steps backwards and some certain number of steps forward in a sense because some of these rights have been enshrined. they are not zombie lost in the late 1800s or 1930s. absolutely, i think at the end of the day, though through the day that there are first roe v. wade because the rights will be stronger. president and ceo at the center of reproductive rights, thanks for joining tonight, thank you. we have a lot more for you this evening. president biden at the halfway point against the presidential return today, and there is cake at the white house, but what was the message written in the icing? plus, the guy that wants to replace president biden in the oval office is facing some defections in the party he once controlled. is
groups are finding new ways to try to reverse some of the damage done by the dobbs decision. this, week a group of religious leaders filed a religious freedom lawsuit opposing missouri s abortion ban. the groups claim that lawmakers who invoked their own religious beliefs while drafting the bill that they violated religious freedom provisions in the state constitution. for 50 years, the antiabortion movement has been finding creative ways to stifle access to the medical procedure. and now the other side is fighting back with its own very novel strategy. joining us now is nancy northrop, president and ceo of the center for reproductive rights. nancy, thanks for being here. absolutely. it s a hard day to think about roe v. wade. i think it s always a hard day. but especially in the context of the last year. the missouri lawsuit is different. and people seem to be very excited about the possibility of this, in terms of applying some right back for the women who have lost an essential
leaders filed a religious freedom lawsuit opposing missouri s abortion ban. the groups claim that lawmakers who invoked their own religious beliefs while drafting the bill that they violated religious freedom provisions in the state constitution. for 50 years, the antiabortion movement has been finding creative ways to stifle access to the medical procedure. and now the other side is fighting back with its own very novel strategy. joining us now is nancy northrop, president and ceo of the center for reproductive rights. nancy, thanks for being here. absolutely. it s a hard day to think about roe v. wade. i think it s always a hard day. but especially in the context of the last year. the missouri lawsuit is different. and people seem to be very excited about the possibility of this, in terms of applying some right back for the women who have lost an essential freedom. how do you see the lawsuit? before we talk about the missouri lawsuit, let s just start because we are at this
through the courts. south carolina, supreme court, just recently recognized the right to abortion in south carolina under its constitution and its right to privacy. so, two steps backwards and some certain number of steps forward in a sense because some of these rights have been enshrined. they are not zombie laws in the late 1800s or 1930s. absolutely, i think at the end of the day, they will the day that there are first roe v. wade because the rights will be stronger. president and ceo at the center of reproductive rights, thanks for joining tonight, thank you. we have a lot more for you this evening. president biden at the halfway point against the presidential return today, and there is cake at the white house, but what was the message written in the icing? plus, the guy that wants to replace president biden in the oval office is facing some defections in the party he once controlled. is there such thing as a post trump republican party? we ll have more on the coming up next.