He said, mom, im shot. Reporter fouryearold mariah her on the left was unharmed. But fiveyearold mark andrews, jr. , was struck once. Chester police are calling eight drive by shooting. Intended targets not latasha and her family but apparently a group of men sitting around outside. Thats little comfort to a mom watching her young son recover in a hospital bed from a gunshot wound. It is ridiculous. Like, we shouldnt have to live like this. My kids dont want to come home. Then what . Shes been asking the Chester Housing authority to move her family to a safer neighborhood for months. After their car was shot up. Now little marks grandmother says shes had enough. Hes five years old. I could have been here planning his funeral, you know . Its got to stop. Reporter that little bullet remains lodged in that little boys shoulder. Not clear when or if it will be removed. But mark could be released from the hospital as early as tomorrow morning. Mom says he remains in good spirits. Planning a
You can also let us know what you think on social media. Our twitter handle is cspanwj. We are on facebook at facebook. Com cspan. Or, you can send us an email at journal cspan. Org. Now, white house spokesman josh earnest was at a News Conference on friday to explain the president s decision. Here is what he said. [video clip] our efforts have improve their performance on the battlefield. It has yielded progress. The president wants to identify that assistance that we are providing. One way to intensify that assistance is pair them up with experts, some of the smartest, bravest, most effective fighters in the United States military. That is exactly what were doing. I do expect that will improve their performance on the battlefield. They will not be in a combat mission. [indiscernible] they could find themselves in a combat situation. There is no denying the amount of risk they are taking on here. They will be equipped to defend themselves. Host we are talking about the u. S. s decisio
Up by the time this president ial election is over with the amount of dark money, undisclosed, Unlimited Money that comes into the political system, that they will be readily accepting of a clarifying change in the irs, thank you. That it isust say always adjusting to me and our friends on the other side who benefit from hundreds of billions of dollars over the reported,t are never are finding fault with something withpeople have to report regard to 501 c fours. Political purposes can sometimes be social purposes and that is why the irs is allowed to be at least 50 for political purposes. Mr. Chairman, i believe that all of it ought to be disclosed. See that you do but all of the union money ought to be disclosed as well and that amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars. It is never going to be because the democrats will not and i wouldo happen say at least they have to disclose to the irs what they are doing and the irs can make determinations as to whether they are doing it properl
Want to enter a statement for the record from congresswoman bernice johnson. It is our pleasure to welcome michael ware. The floor is yours. Thank you. Excuse me, is your microphone on . It is. A little closer. Members of the subcommittee, a year ago congress reauthorized the federal aviation administration. After 4. 5 years the predictability reauthorization provided was welcome. It allowed us to have greater certainty, and we are grateful to have this committee on this and we have been working diligently to implement the provisions of reauthorization, the one year later we again faced unpredictability. The sequester is looming. I want to make a clear distinction about how sequestration differs from previous Government Shutdowns that have been caused by a failure to pass the budget or a temporary lapse in authorization that took place in 2011. First, almost all of our faa accounts would be affected, and this would affect all employees. We are looking at all options to reduce costs the
This on your car and therefore, the Auto Companies do it and charge people higher prices for their car, that may have a good benefit cost ratio but it doesnt show up as spending the money. So regulations is a substitute and tax expenditures are a substitute for spending. So you would need to have some complementary legislation or safety valve to prevent that you could tighten if all of a sudden the spending cap started to bind and edging into regulation and tax expenditures. The other is when you look at spending, there is this fundamental fact of arithmetic we cant get around that present discount of taxes has to equal future spending plus the National Debt. The government has to pay its bills now or later. A dollar of borrowing now means the interest tomorrow has to be raised to pay off the interest. So with that in mind, its very, very important that the spending caps be reasonable and bind and there is some mechanism by which we dont, even with reasonable spending caps, start conti