Lowerbe Point News Today

To answer straightforward questions. its called legitimate debate. to a "washington post" reporter, someone who lives in a world where every singlewh person has identical views of everything, all of them fashionable, all of them unquestioned, that looks like bad faith to him. naturally, we invited weigel to come on tonight and explain himself. i emailed him this morning. he wrote back to say that he couldnt do it. he was planning to watch a movie. two obvious points. first, diversity means diffe...

>> tucker: im just saying, do you think that the declaration should be stored in the national archives. >> i think it has historical value, but we have to recognize the people who wrote it back in the 1700s had very different views than we do and had a very different understanding of the world. >> tucker: if you saw a swing set in oil city, pennsylvania, that had a cross on it, someone carved a cross in it, a christian symbol, would you tell them to take it down? >> no. o >> tucker: why? >> unle...

A medieval problem. people sweeping across europe borders. romans dealt with it. 2,000 years ago, the solution then was a wall. the chinese built a wall, english built a wall, israel built a wall, they work. why wouldnt it work in arizona? >> good many reasons.n one is cost, tucker. 10,000 years, mankind has beenn building around walls around things. one would think in 2017 with the robust array of resources we have, o resources, we can come up with a better solution. i am absolutely a proponent...

Open up to all points of view -- >> tucker: the supreme court didnt say that, thats why the currency continues to have "in god we trust" on it. federal judges are also invoking god.er im just saying, we live in a country where the u.s. government uses the word god all the time. >> the supreme court says it is ceremonial deism. and we still fight that. we we think it is wrong because- >> tucker: why not take on the currency? >> we have! >> tucker: basically the point is -- you crush the little gu...

Down of his fellows, mocking him, laughing him. i tweeted the next day, take this guy seriously. >> tucker: you are smarter than most on that. i think youre absolutely right there. dr he was not taken seriously bye. the press. they like him because they thought he was a sideshow, divided a pretty strong field. when it became clear he had a remote chance of winning, they piled up -- the guys who campaigned on "the new york times," we dont have to guess what they wrote, they wrote it. right after ...