The Bench also noted that the time period envisaged under Section 61 of the IBC and Section 421 of the Companies Act was for filing of the appeal and not for re-filing after the defects having been cured. It was further observed that Rule 26 did not entail any period of limitation., , NCLAT, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), companies act
While rejecting the claim of an appellant, the principal bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the doctrine of res judicata (a matter decided) applies to proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
While rejecting the claim of an appellant, the principal bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the doctrine of res judicata (a matter decided) applies to proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Setback For Jagan Govt s Three-Capital Plan As Andhra High Court Orders Amaravati Masterplan To Be Implemented swarajyamag.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from swarajyamag.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.