military truce. u.s. diplomats are scrambling to extend that agreement since a number of hostages are still being held captive. also, the red cross that was supposed to gain access to them, has not had access. we know a key part of the ongoing talks is getting adult males released. it s been women and children so far almost entirely with a few exceptions. we know israeli troops are at the ready, prepared operat operationally, along the truce lines in gaza should this pause expire and military actions resume. let s start here with jeremy diamond. jeremy, you re in israel. we saw people in the street celebrating. they re hoping for the arrival of some more hostages coming from gaza. reporter: yeah, that s true. when we got here earlier this evening, there were just a few people, but word spread quickly that the group of hostages was set to come through here on their way to the air base in front of me. what we saw earlier in the last hour was these scenes of absolute jubilat
of the case. four hours or something. how could you possibly decide a case that quickly? ever since then i think i probably covered most if not all high-profile cases since then, certainly all with sequestered juries. none of them have come back that quickly, even when there was a i lot of agreement on the jury. here, i think given the first note, they will be much more ma tick laos. i expect tomorrow we ll probably hear some of the exhibits that they want to see. they will check off what they want to see you don t think there will be a verdict tomorrow? i would be surprised. for this reason or so much stuff to go through? if you get a list of all the evidence, that means you want to see some of the evidence. that becomes time consuming. once you start getting into read backs of testimony, that s really time consuming because the lawyers have to agree what is responsive to the note. i just don t see a verdict tomorrow, sunday, monday, we ll see. the notes will give us a h
juries. none of them have come back that quickly, even when there was a i lot of agreement on the jury. here, i think given the first note, they will be much more ma tick laos. i expect tomorrow we ll probably hear some of the exhibits that they want to see. they will check off what they want to see you don t think there will be a verdict tomorrow? i would be surprised. for this reason or so much stuff to go through? if you get a list of all the evidence, that means you want to see some of the evidence. that becomes time consuming. once you start getting into read backs of testimony, that s really time consuming because the lawyers have to agree what is responsive to the note. i just don t see a verdict tomorrow, sunday, monday, we ll see. the notes will give us a hint of how they are doing. during the closing arguments, mark o mara asked the jury to consider only the facts when deciding the case. i want to play that. what i don t think you should do is fill in any gaps a
possible. it s been done before. it has never been done before. it s been done a couple of times. jack kennedy lowered tax rates now you re jack kennedy. awesome. joe biden is yeah. but, you know, actually, couple things there. one is the biden saying not mathematically possible over and over again which is sort of where i think a lot of the left wanted the president to go really hard on this doesn t work. it s not it s not amyth ma tick the math doesn t work. but then the jack kennedy thing i m curious to know what you thought of that. some on the right thought that was really unnecessary, that was a low blow, that wasn t very statesman like. other people said put the young whipper snapper in his place. that moment was just systematic of the debate. joe biden versus joe biden. ryan barely showed up. he passed the threshold and did fine but if you like sneering attacks from this kind of
move up character and take down character. we ve seen that donald trump is trying to tear down comey s character and has been. now comey, who has to defend himself, has to defend himself against that memo that was written by rod rosenstein. so how do you do that? you have one of your allies go out there and question what his integrity is. almost like he is going down a checklist. maybe because of the ma tick ck notes the fbi director took, why is it significant? it is significant. the white house counsel will normally steer the president through things that will involve the administration, formal and official problems that may come up. now we re getting into the realm of problems unique to the president personally.