Page 18 - Majority Decision News Today

Clarify the long term relationship and then we have a good perspective for the future now you are the conservative candidate in these upcoming e.u. elections of course it will have an impact there either way the ticket also on those populist parties youve reached already across the aisle calling on all parties to basically join forces against the vis of populists from the right how do you want to avoid these elections becoming a de facto referendum for or against europe or for against migration ...

Brics negotiations now spain wants it back in the big question can they really jeopardize the summit can they block and can they veto this entire process yes a no no because it will not be a unanimous vote its a majority decision but its the no is its unlikely that the e.u. will want to risk its chop a stool in the negotiation box and that was always unity and they will not risk it so this is this looks right like really rocky negotiations to come there ok briefly tell us what happens next in th...

Days weve been talking with the u.k. from the e.u. side it clear that they want to post brakes a veto on and in that evolves part of the paper the end of this huge hundreds of pages there was a clause that guaranteed spain that they would have opposed breaks it veto but thats cause has disappeared in the final stages of the brics negotiations now spain wants it back in the big question can they really jeopardize the summit can they block and can they veto this entire process yes a no no because ...

Getting at for instance. youre already seeing efforts on the democratic side to sort of preemptively delegitimize any majority decision, especially a 5-4 decision that includes brett kavanaugh. theres already discussion of impeachment proceedings or efforts to pack the court and add another two justices. michael avenatti has tried to make that sort of a litmus test for any presidential candidate. so the policy implications should not be overlooked. they are dramatic and we will feel them for yea...

The decent written by the chief justice which takes exceptions to the majority decision saying distorted decision precedent. he goes onto say everyone more disturbing is holding the tone of the courts opinion. neither the holding or the tone or the opinion is faithful to the meaning of the establishment clause. when it is recalled that george washington himself at the request of the very congress which passed the bill of rights proclaim of public of thanksgiving and prayers to be observed by ack...

Society, behind kavanaugh are also behind all these senators and nobody wants to quarrel with the big funders of their party. it is all line up, salute, drive this guy onto the court. >> youre one of the more thorough legal minds i interviewed in the senate. i think thats why youre on judiciary, i know you were state attorney general, you sort of -- this is your home turf. help the viewer tomorrow. when various senators ask the question about settled law, what should they be listening for when i...

They ultimately ruled that they did, but in morrison, justice scalia dissented and that decision by the way is basically going to be overruled, if it already has been. many jurists including justice elena kagan says that justice scalia was right on point on this. so that decision -- >> but you had a majority decision that went against what youre arguing right now. >> no, not on point because we had several other arguments that were not addressed in morrison and that dealt with a different issue ...

Whether or not the special -- in that case, the independent counsel satisfied the separation of powers in the appointment clause. they ultimately ruled that they did, but in morrison, justice scalia dissented and that decision by the way is basically going to be overruled, if it already has been. many jurists including justice elena kagan says that justice scalia was right on point on this. so that decision -- >> but you had a majority decision that went against what youre arguing right now. >> ...

Confirmation battle. >> in 1973 by a vote of 7-2 the supreme court struck down a texas law criminalizing abortions but in cases where the act would save the life of the mother and the justice majority decision said that it was a privacy issue protected under the clause of the 14th amendment and opponents of roe v. wade say that that decision was undemocrat and before 1973 citizens of each state could determine determine the degree to which they wished to criminalize abortions and roe v. wade is ...

Republican side. but you could see some senate democrats up for election in red states decide that they want to vote with the president on this one. how are you approaching it politically? >> the ad, like the one that you just showed, it is really ludicrous because it is exactly the wrong way to approach this. this should not be a political vote. this is not something where you are asking a potential justice, a nominee, how they are going to rule in future cases. but with that said, roe v. wade ...