national agenda, look bannon and trump are arm in arm on this, and they will still push for the issues, such as immigration. why the confidence that the president on his own will motivate that agenda when we haven t seen that from him, unilaterally to this point? look where he stands on immigration. he is certainly strong on immigration, building the wall we don t know that it will raise wages for the working person clearly he tapped into something in the country. i think bannon lit the torch and carried the torch, the question is who will carry it forward? there is a lot of talk on the establishment republican, but some refer to it as the white house democrats, jared and iv ivanka and cohn, i think what
party, by name. mitt romney, scolding him, not a surprise perhaps, but military commanders rebuking the president. that is a major surprise. and today on top of it all and perhaps in a matter more of convenience than coincidence, the president fired his chief strategist, steve bannon. take a look at this picture, first it was michael flynn, then sean spicer, then reince priebus, then the meteoric rise and fall of anthony scaramucci, the mooch. then steve bannon gone and we hear that more heads could roll, sebastian gorka, dr. gorka, to you and me. and the flames fanned, bannon back at his old website,
bannon said there is no military solution for north korea, that was seen as a little bit of a okay, one step too far. forgi forget about the timing, he has to go right now. this is significant because of what it is not about. that this is not about charlottesville, virginia, that what happened there and was said there by the president was all of his own. that was not bannon engineered and the reason for his exit, true? well, make no mistake, i mean, this certainly did change the news cycle today. when the president was called out essentially by the mother of heather heyer on morning television earlier today, when the mother of heather heyer said i will not speak to the president this was going to be a devastating news cycle for this white house today, in forcing steve bannon out. that certainly did change the narrative and news cycle. i mean, one of the things we re hearing is whether or not steve bannon and breitbart are going to go to war against this white
head. so i believe it s smart for the president and those at the administration not to do anything to provoke him, because they know breitbart has a lot of power. i don t think it s going to train his focus on the administration, i really don t. i honestly believe bannon wants what he wants, which is a nationalist agenda. and i think as long as donald trump doesn t turn on that agenda, nobody in that media orbit, particularly his family, will feel his wrath. one thing we know about donald trump he is again almost constitutionally lally incapab saying he made a mistake. so as much as he may not have a philosophical allegiance to a nationalist agenda, i think he has a personal vested interest in never actually saying i m going to do something different. so anyone waiting for some type of triangulation in the form of
had not gotten bannon out of there. he had a mandate and agreement with the president that he could clean house. i m sure kelly would have gone to the president and said it s either him or me, you can t have us both because it s not working. so i think that was the main calculus, so the question is, is bannon out there to discredit in a more serious way, the mueller team. he is going to have money coming in as we know from mr. mercer, who put in at least $10 million to breitbart in the past. and has a lot of his own money. this is a man of needs, other people have to go take care of their families and get a job that makes money. he can really do whatever he wants. i wouldn t question for you i will question for you, david,