Page 171 - Malpractice News Today

Signed, what didnt. this is all supposed to be about russia collusion. michael cohen admitted right off the bat there was nothing substantive that he could show on russia collusion. so we wasted all this time talking about something that wasnt what the focus of this week should have been. they could have held this hearing anytime they wanted. they chose today. and as a former white house staffer, i can tell you as much as theyre focused on whats going on in north korea and furthering the preside...

Rise in the community. there are men and women in uniform and non-uniform, responders and survivors that are panicking, and for many this is a lifeline. the conversations are real. should i put gas in the car or should i pay my car insurance? should i put food on the table or should i pay the utilities? congress now has something tangible to work with, and they either have the choice, a conscious choice, to get on board and help co-sponsor this bill and get it passed or they can make that consci...

Potentially about this testimony and to jeffreys other point. the documentation will matter so much because of cohens own credibility problems, which the president will try to bring up at every turn and his lawyer rudy giuliani has. thats where corroboration will mean something in the eyes of the public. >> these republicans on this committee are going to come after michael cohen in a big, big way. what do you expect to see? >> one of the reasons michael cohen is going to jail is because he lied...

Come together like we did 18 years ago. they can take our worst day, our worst weeks and months and especially our worst 18 years since and come together and make congresss finest hour. they have a chance to be that guy and anybody who practices political malpractice well expose them. >> sandra: john stewart you published an opinion piece talking about the need for funding this bill. what 9/11 heroes need from congress. you talked about walking the halls of congress with the injured and ill 9/11...

Justin fairfax to take partisanship out of it? >> absolutely. no question about it. these issues should not be seen through a partisan lens. that the that is what is going on. but lack of investigation of justin fairfax is basically moral malpractice on behalf of democratic politicians. these scandals we are seeing today, thank goodness it was national margarita day. scandal after scandal after scandal. can we start to finally talk about toxic masculinity which im not saying is something that is...

These issues should not be seen through a partisan lens, i think sadly that is what is going on but the lack of investigation for lieutenant governor fairfax is basically moral malpractice on the behalf of democratic politicians. these scandals that we are seeing today, i mean come on mike, thank goodness it was national margarita day. scandal after scandal after scandal. can we start to finally talk about toxic masculinity which im not saying is something about all men are bad, but it is about ...

It would be like malpractice to do that. that being said, theyve done a lot of strange things in the presidents defense team so it wouldnt totally shock me. >> real quickly, is it the lawyers problem or would it be the presidents problem? >> the optics are terrible. legally, it could be terrible. the pardon power is almost absolute, but you cant use it corruptly, and if there were conversations whether it was directly or indirectly through surrogates like lawyers, terrible optics and terrible le...

Carefully worded statement saying we loved you in 2016. we love you now, but we are blessed to have a very large field of progressive candidates so we will see how it shapes out, talk to you in a bit. that is basically what it was. senator sanders has every right and it would be political malpractice for him not to be saying what he said this morning. he did put these issues on the map. they were considered radical. to be clear to people who are not in the democratic party who are not focussed o...

Law and a matter of policy. so "the wall street journal" is right on point with their editorial. >> melissa: how do you define that gap in the middle? what do you mean? if you want to remove the president -- if what? >> lets assume hes just doing a terrible job and he never shows up, doesnt nominate anybody, he goes to the gym every day, hes capable of governing and hes very smart but he just wont do the work. he wont appoint ambassadors, he wont meet with anybody. that person shouldnt be the pr...

To be a credible figure. what has stood out to you covering this beat most of all? >> well, i think the two most startling things that stood out in the "60 minutes" interview were first that he was admitting that he had -- disclosing that he had opened this counterintelligence investigation against the president. and the way he described it was that, you know, given all of these things that they were seeing the president do and say, that if they saw anybody taking these steps or engaging in thes...