sworn testimony. is your committee prepared to further investigate the claims? let me start by saying, i don t think the president is upset that michael cohen is lying, he s upset that michael cohen is no longer lying for him. lying for him is precisely why mr. cohen is going to jail. look at the body of evidence here. 199 criminal charges, 37 criminal indictments and plea deals, now five prison sentences to the people closest to the president. independent sources have validated that the president has lied, what, 9,000 times? some ast nomic number. i trust the american people will weigh all the evidence and come to the obvious conclusion. as you said, michael cohen admits to lying for the president when he was working for the president, then wanted to come back and clean it up and tell more about his experience. did you get the answers that you were looking for? did michael cohen s testimony
keeping the international community supporting guaido, putting pressure on maduro. i don t know if you saw this week, maduro threw out the german ambassador. huge mistake. we have done good with that. some of the language is over the top. i don t think we really want to do it. such as, potential use of the military, u.s. military in some way of intervening. you think that is i think that i don t want to say it s not a possibility, it is a possibility. the president is right to keep it on the table. unless it is very dire circumstances, the military is shooting people in the streets. i think it s very unlikely the u.s. military will intervene. china and russia are backing the maduro regime, blocking venezuela, particularly at the united nations. what do they have to gain? they have little to gain.
manafort continued to commit crimes and later lied to investigators when he was supposed to be cooperating. a federal judge in virginia sentenced him to nearly four years in prison, far less than the recommended sentence of 19-25 years. this sentence, in my view, failed to do justice to the very serious crimes that manafort has committed as well as his utter disrespect for the law. reporter: the comments manafort s lawyer made after the sentencing further inflamed democrats. there is no evidence that paul manafort was involved in collusion with any government official from russia. reporter: adam schiff fired back via twitter, saying the statement by paul manafort s lawyer, after an already lenient sentence, repeating the president s mantra was no accident, it was an appeal for a pardon.
none of the other financial institutions would do so. deutsche bank, you know, has been accused of russian money laundering. what kind of documents, if any, has your committee looked into? thank you for reminding viewers that, in fact, deutsche bank was willing to enter into lending arrangements when no other domestic american bank would touch him. we are trying to get to the why to that. from an intelligence committee standpoint, what is important is if there is a history or pattern of financial entanglement that compromises the president or candidate for president. there was a story, at first deutsche bank wouldn t. then it ended up doing so. are you satisfied with the why? no, i don t think we are to the why. an obvious question in this regard, to give you an
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20190309:19:50:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.