prosecution s closing. the judge tells them sympathy play no role. you will notice chertoff moves his chair. if he had jumped up and objected they would looks like this horrible defense lawyer talking about the kids. you can t do that. he made the right call in staying seated and hopefully the jury will look at the acts of conrad murray and what he did and didn t do. megyn: is there a chance this jury is going say michael jackson was the addict, michael jackson is the one who asked for the propofol. even if he didn tackson is ultimately responsible. not if the jury takes in the jury instructions the judge gave earlier. basically he didn t say it outright. but basically michael jackson even if he was an addict and trying to take the propofol. if conrad murray allowed that
empathize with conrad murray or michael jackson. we haven t talked that much about michael jackson s children. and how they don t have a father. it was not a point that was lost on the prosecution. for them this case doesn t end today or tomorrow or the next day. for michael s children this case will go upon forever because they do not have a father. they to not have a father because of the actions of conrad murray. megyn: do they hold that do they hold that against dr. murray or do the jurors hold that against michael jackson. let s face it. the man was an addict. i know the doctor was not supposed to fuel the habit. but might they be in a personal responsibility kind of mind frame? the defense is hoping for that. but i think they will hold that against conrad murray. i would have been off my seat and that would have bent only time i objected during the
not guilty because they care about him, could say it fell short of a willful and wanton disregard. megyn: will the jurors believe conrad murray cared about michael jackson or will they believe was motivated by money, $150,000 a month, and doing whatever it was his employer/the addict asked of him. i want to play a little bit more sound top that point from the prosecutor. conrad murray sought payment for services rendered. services rendered being the provision of propofol to michael jackson in his bedroom on an almost nightly basis for over two months, according to conrad murray s own word. for services rendered. not for proper medical care, not for the sake of doing no harm, but an employee-employer
the best laid plans. our apologies to speaker gingrich and our apologies to you telling you it will happen. we hope to have speaker gingrich join us tomorrow or very soon and we ll bring that to you if and when it happens. one step closer to a verdict in the man salute were trial of michael jackson s personal doctor. closing arguments are underway at this moment. it all comes down to this. who is making the stronger argument? kelly s court in three minutes. for them this case doesn t end today or tomorrow or the next day. for michael s children this case will go on forever because they do not have a father.
bolton will weigh in live on the escalating tensions between israel and iran and wait could mean for the united states. jurors could be deciding the fate very soon of michael jackson s personal doctor. closing arguments are underway in conrad murray s manslaughter trial. he s accused of causing the pop star s death with a lethal dose of a powerful sedative. the jury could begin deliberations later today. adam housley is outside the courthouse in l.a. reporter: 23 days of testimony. the jury hearing closing arguments. the d.a. began his closing arguments a little over an hour ago. but he has been absolutely compelling so far. he talked about the fact there has been 49 witnesses. he says the evidence is overwhelming. the evidence is about the trust of a doctor and if a doctor has