force of personality, is my opinion. i sense you are very good at that? i think i was, absolutely. i mean, you just make rulings firmly, you don t take further argument after you ve ruled. you say sit down, if somebody keeps talking. i ve heard enough, thank you very much. so, you have to be tough, you have to be decisive, you have to be quick. and that takes experience. do you think the date that d. a. willis has proposed, march 24, is realistic? absolutely not, absolutely not. and do you believe, it seems unlikely there will still be 19 defendants, whatever it does go to trial. it seems like some of those are low-hanging fruits. of course, of course. some of them going to plead out, some of them going to cooperate, which is always the big risk. rushing in, who is going to be first to turn and cooperate in the coming states witness. so won t be 19, but i bet it will be double digits. if it s not part of it, in
for six to eight months, probably never had to control a courtroom which is not easy, there are a lot of lawyers jumping up and down making a lot of motions. it is not going to be easy for a new judge to do that. we hear about that so often like the importance of the judge controlling the courtroom. how does a judge set down the marker early on i am in charge? force of personality is my opinion. i sense you were very good at that i think i was. absolutely. you just make rulings firmly, you don t take further argument after you ve ruled. you say sit down if somebody keeps talking. i ve heard enough. thank you very much. you have to be tough. you have to be decisive. you have to be quick. that takes experience. do you think the date that the da willis has proposed, march 24, is realistic? absolutely not. do you believe there will still be it seems unlikely there will be 19 defendants when it goes to trial. it seems some of those are low hanging fruit. of course. some ar
he is indicated recently that he would be open to talking to other prosecutors and perhaps rearranging that date. march 24 sound like a good date on the january 6 trial to me. all right, we shall see. thank you. maggie, final thoughts from you? what should we be looking for next? next we are going to see again whether trump does something that the judge considers violative of this order on social media. we will look for what trump said this weekend when he is in iowa. we will look at the next debate and the first debate, and whether trump actually goes. wolf, we have never seen anything like this. this is a series of legal actions wrapped around political campaign. this is not a normal political season. trump, obviously, is using this campaign is something of a shield. we have been talking about that long before he actually got in the race. it s part of why he got in the race as early as he did antifreeze the fields. we are looking at everything he says about this.
start march 24 s, any chance they get the case tried before the 2024 election, maybe before the old office trial that supposed to start march? i can tell you from personal experience, likely they would try to delay, and do so in our case, filing a lawsuit against me in our office, the federal court even though it was a state case, took us on a year and a half journey to the supreme court. i think what will drive the timing the federal court, this is a federal case, one can argue trying to apply federal crimes and applied to a felony, that leads one into a federal jurisdiction issue, one can t make that argument here, i will