just an observe. know we have been struggling with the deviation between one and two for many weeks now. i know we had many discussions around the cathedral hill border but the numbers are district five is over deviation by 2%. i m not necessarily proposing anything. it s just an observation there may be population within 55.2 border if the task force members are continuing to think or struggle with the 1-2 deviations. the pros poll as, we will take them one at a time but the is to reverse the 64 population decision. the second would be to go to the 25th avenue block. everyone clear on the questions? yes. apologize. can i ask the implication of creating an assembly district for the purposes of 64 people on the median? it s just more administrative work. that doesn t mean there are more registered voters there. we are cleaning up a lot of the lines. there are zero populations ones which are really annoying for them and there s another couple of population ones you
be in range, it would be 4.97. you said discussion? yes. that s not a question though. we can we look at the layer of sequences defined? what does that have to do with this question? got it. there s no public submission for the boundry but we can look at the planning neighborhoods. this is the planning neighborhoods of sea cliff. would you like to also see, it also goes and extend out. any other questions? all right. miss tidwell? yes. mr. schreiber? yes. mr. pilpel? yes. miss mondejar? yes. miss lam? yes. miss ma melara? yes. mr. league? yes. mr. leeg leigh. yes. no. i will look at the deviations. thank you. can i make a comment while at the look at the numbers? sure. i think the pop lore initially had either ben the four blocks between two and five as a way to clean the lines. so since those are not submitted as part of a neighborhood, i would suggest we look there to the extent we still have a population issue. ok.
came to testify so passionately but respectfully for their neighborhoods in district 11. so far we have only lost population in those areas we all agreed to sacrifice to keep district 11 whole. it is an honor to serve with them on the council and to have them as friends. thank you, and one last please, don t make any further changes to district 11. thank you, ma am. yes, mrs. brown? hi, my name is marzel brown and i work with central city collaborative. and today i m here on the behalf of the bristol hotel. which is located on 56 mason. mike nolty has showed you the little map area of where we want to stay. it is very, very small as you can see this little section right here. that s what we need to keep in district six. so if you guys will help us out, and remap that, it will be a great deal to us and the tenants in the bristol hotel that we deal with on a daily basis. thank you again for your time and your preparations and you guys do a wonderful job. keep up the good wo
and district 9, 4.8%. district 9 becomes 4.8, is that correct? yes. from the current 4.81. ok. d-10 would become with this change negative .87. d-9 would become 4.80 by moving this population of three. any questions? mr. alanso? sure. mr. leigh? yes. miss melara? yes. miss lam? yes. miss mondejar? yes. miss pilpel? yes. mr. schreiber? yes. miss tidwell? yes. please make the change. we have one more population move that we wanted to bring to you. this one is between the district seven and district four. this is a congressional line you would align to. it s 19th after median. it would move from 7 to 9. total population 7 to 4 you mean? yes. how can it move from 7 to 9? yes, 7 to 4. not 7 to 9. what s the population? nine. resulting deviation? the resulting deviation would be for district four, negative.96% and four district seven, negative .3%. ok. any questions? i guess i would like to know, i drive there a lot. i don t
my name is doug comstock. i want to talk about a block north of panhandle. we want to keep this block in the panhandle because we re stronger together. it is a beautiful blocked. it is a victorian blocked. it has nothing to do with the richmond. it is entirely panhandle architecture. it is part of our community. thank you for restoring 11 of the blocks. however, is integral to our neighborhood and battles against st. mary s and their encroachment for outpatient services throughout our residential district. if we were not there to fight them, we would not be a residential district. we would be all outpatient services for that hospital and usf. we are continuing the battle. we have been doing it for 25 years. we need this blocked because it is right next to st. mary s hospital. it would be the first hit if we did not have it within our district. there has emerged a new block. it is new construction. it is pretty well known as the fulton plaza. it is only a few years old. thes