to challenge the election results. it actually pretty unusual and a very big deal that somebody who was on that legal team is playing ball with the committee and cooperating with them, at least in as extensive as away as kerik has engaged. now, phil waldron might not be a household name, he s not even a household name necessarily in my household. waldron is really interesting though because he s most associated with, i think a 38-page powerpoint plan that circulated on capitol hill that found its way to mark meadows inbox, when he was white house chief of staff. and that laid out a very expensive plan for trying to overturn the election results. additionally, waldron has told reporters that when he was in the defense intelligence agency that he worked with michael flynn when michael flynn was there as well. and so waldron claims to have that connection. the u.s. defense department hasn t commented on the nature of waldron s military service, but he says he has got relationship with
committee as part of an interview. we have reached out to waldron for comment and and have not heard back. and remember, the folks who talked to the january 6th select committee are not necessarily reliable narrators, but kerik is a really important witness for them because he was actually part of trump s outside legal team that worked on all these lawsuits, trying to challenge the election results. it s actually pretty unusual and a very big deal that somebody who was on that legal team is playing ball with the committee and cooperating with them, at least in as extensive as a way as kerik has engaged. now, phil waldron might not be a household name, he s not even a household name necessarily in my household. waldron is really interesting though because he s most associated with, i think a 38 -page powerpoint plan that circulated on capitol hill that found its way to mark meadows inbox, when he was white house chief of staff. and that laid out a very extensive plan for trying to overt
we pulled every text that the committee has so far released. it s really helping to paint a picture of what happened, especially since there s been such a chasm between public station bag, lawmakers in fox news, versus the concern in panic and put directly into mark meadows inbox. yeah, the releases of these it s like a serialized drama. how is the committee deciding which texts are released publicly and when to release them? do we have a sense that they re holding on to texts, that are maybe even more explosive in terms of public reception? absolutely, the committee is trying to ensure that they have the most public hearings possible and that means pulling back some of these text messages. that being said the trail of bread crumbs they ve left so far in releasing some of meadows s text messages with people like jim jordan, sean hannity, and as we reported this morning james o keefe. have been fairly juicy.
planning, leading to january 6th altogether. these text messages especially if you are we pulled every text that the committee has so far released. it s really helping to paint a picture of what happened, especially since there s been such a chasm between public station bag, lawmakers in fox news, versus the concern in panic and put directly into mark meadows inbox. yeah, the releases of these it s like a serialized drama. how is the committee deciding which texts are released publicly and when to release them? do we have a sense that they re holding on to texts, that are maybe even more explosive in terms of public reception? absolutely, the committee is trying to ensure that they have the most public hearings possible and that means pulling back some of these text messages.