Lets go to a second question and that is given the way in which this nexus crosses two communities, the Law Enforcement community and the National Security community, are we effectively organized to deal with these problems and the special issues of this nexus and how should we be changing our organization nationally or internationally to be dealing with these issues. Any thoughts from the panelists . We should not go to knee jerk reactions when a major disaster happens and ill give you an example. Back in the days of my partnership of trying to bridge that gap between intel and Law Enforcement and Work Together, during that time we had an Organization Called the organized crime operation. S group. Case officers from the cia, i had about 15, at any given time 15 to 20 fbi agents and analysts assigned there fulltime. It was very successful. With regard to Human Trafficking internationally, we did two renditions in that program for Major International human smugglers working together. 9
Table. They are reviews. We use them we review them very carefully afterwards. That is why we think our programs have improved over the years because we listen to what you have to say and try to give you the type of programs you really are interested in. We would also have another announcement. Our committee will be having on friday november 15 an address addressed by ambassador marc grossman. He is the vicechairman of the cohen group. He will be speaking about the Diplomatic Campaign in afghanistan and pakistan. He will be at the University Club at 8 00 a. M. On november 15 so please take out your black areas in iphones. We also have another speaker. The Senior Adviser for transnational Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Program at the center for strategic and international studies. That will be wednesday december 4. Also at 8 00 a. M. To 9 00 a. M. And that also will be held at the University Club which is on 16th street in the northwest. I also have a very special announcement.
The court hate oral argument on the case in september. This is 40 minutes. Good morning your honors. I am Francis Manion representing the appellate in this case. The central christian in this case should be whether the government has shown a compelling interest in forcing this particular Family Business to include contraception in its health plans against the familys religious beliefs at the same time the government has decided not to impose that same requirements on millions of other employers for both religious and nonreligious region reasons. The District Court never reach this question because contrary to Supreme Courts teaching in the case it focused on the formal identity of the parties instead of on the law that we say and that the government acknowledges implicates religious liberty interests. The District Court did answer these two questions first whether or not gilardi is substantially burdened by the hhs this hhs mandate and the court encrypt they said no. The court incorrec
Ex-Officials Urge Curbing Presidential Power to Deploy Troops on U S Soil dnyuz.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dnyuz.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.