imagine if somebody was running against obama polling in double digits. it would get floor media attention. now trying to cover this administration is lake trying to catch confetti. we can t cover it all. i want to talk about charlie s point about, you know, kind of appealing to some of those voters, you know, the romney/clinton voters. they re still republicans, still ideological differences. when you try to appeal to those people you run the risk. how can you appeal and then come back and talk to your base? why not double down on your base and inspire those people to get out instead of trying to appeal to trump voters? does the trump vote hit differently or what? why are so many people focused on trying to appeal to those people who are typically republicans? i have never heard the republican party sitting around talking about how can we get these democrats over to our side? only democrats do that. i don t know that is a winning strategy. i guess the math question is, just as a sta
i guess the math question is, just as a statistical matter, are there more available democratic voters who stayed home last time or are there more of these romney/clinton potential voters? which is a bigger pot? i think that is a really difficult piece of math in part because it is hard to know exactly how many democratic votes were left on the table for hillary clinton in 2016. in my mind i think this may be a choice the democrats don t have to make in some sense. if you re talking about romney clinton voters you re talking about voters a majority of whom want to impeach the president in terms of the polling we ve done in late 2018 so there may be certain kinds of voters that are, have not been loyal democrats for decades but are nevertheless onboard with what democratic candidates are likely to offer and so you re able to mobilize the base and keep some
republicans? i have never heard the republican party sitting around talking about how can we get these democrats over to our side? only democrats do that. i don t know that is a winning strategy. i guess the math question is, just as a statistical matter, are there more available democratic voters who stayed home last time or are there more of these romney/clinton potential voters? which is a bigger pot? i think that is a really difficult piece of math in part because it is hard to know exactly how many democratic votes were left on the table for hillary clinton in 2016. in my mind i think this may be a choice the democrats don t have to make in some sense. if you re talking about romney clinton voters you re talking about voters a majority of whom want to impeach the president in terms of the polling we ve done in late 2018 so there may be certain kinds of voters that
guys who were born in morris to juarez? to my response is that s okay. that sounds fine. the alternative on offer is this. tucker: you re seeing the people who create wealth ought to get a piece of the wealth, okay? they are not saying that. absolutely. tucker: they are saying people who had no role at all in building this country, no role at all building this wealth. could show up here from oaxaca or wherever, illegally, should get the bounty. that s not socialism. that s insanity. and it doesn t work, actually, as a math question. all of us are going to be shafted if we try and do that, why not just say that? because it s true. two things. if that s not socialism, then we don t have a problem in your previous guess, i don t know what he s hooting and hollering about. i grew up in southern colorado and i grew up traveling around lots of cities that were actually built by plenty of people who today would trace their ancestors into mexico and places like this in the most importa
which my response is, what s so bad about that? the alternative is this. but you are tucker: you are saying that people who create wealth ought to get a piece of the wealth. they are not saying that. they are saying that people will have no role at all in building this country no role at all in building that wealth should show up here tomorrow from oaxaca illegally and should get the bounty. that s not socialism, that s insanity. and it doesn t work, actually. it s a math question. all of us are going to be shafted if we try to do that. were not just say that because it s true? law, two things, if that s not socialism, we don t have a problem. but i grew up in southern colorado and i grew up traveling around lots of cities that were actually built by plenty of people who today would trace their ancestors into mexico in places like this and the most important thing is not who built