i am i think and as far as liberty is meaningful. that liberty to these women would mean liberty from being forced to continue the unwanted pregnancy. branch of your argument simply on the due process clause in the 14th amendment. we had originally brought the suit alleging both the due process clause equal protection clause the 9th amendment and a variety of others then anything else. it might. yeah, right, you know since the district court found the right to reside in the nights amendment we pointed our attention in the brief. so that particular aspect of the constitution. that was an exchange between jane roe council sarah weddington and supreme court justice potter stewart in the december 13th, 1971 argument of roe vs. suede joshua prager. you ve spent 12 years working on a book about the row case. did it lead you to being able to explain or understand better why this has been as in your words the most enduringly divisive case ever decided by the supreme court. well, i
i am i think and as far as liberty is meaningful. that liberty to these women would mean liberty from being forced to continue the unwanted pregnancy. branch of your argument simply on the due process clause in the 14th amendment. we had originally brought the suit alleging both the due process clause equal protection clause the 9th amendment and a variety of others then anything else. it might. yeah, right, you know since the district court found the right to reside in the nights amendment we pointed our attention in the brief. so that particular aspect of the constitution. that was an exchange between jane roe council sarah weddington and supreme court justice potter stewart in the december 13th, 1971 argument of roe vs. suede joshua prager. you ve spent 12 years working on a book about the row case. did it lead you to being able to explain or understand better why this has been as in your words the most enduringly divisive case ever decided by the supreme court. well, i