To an end as he stated many times. We look forward to that happening. The president is not obstructing, hes fighting back. The president is stating his opinion. Hes stating it clearly. Hes certainly expressing the frustration he has with the level of corruption that weve seen from people like jim comey, peter strzok, andrew mccabe, theres a reason the president is angry. Frankly, most of america is angry as well. Theres no reason he shouldnt be able to voice that opinion. Once again as i stated earlier, the president stating his opinion. Its not an order. Hes been Crystal Clear how he feels about this investigation from the beginning. You said a moment ago the investigation itself is corrupt. The mueller investigation, you mentioned comey and strzok. The entire investigation based off dirty, discredited dossier that was paid for by an opposing campaign. The latest news from around the world with host Brooke Baldwin. At a public rally and yet people trying to yell over and defending the
pretty severe punishment. here is what peter strzok s attorney told nbc news. this should be troubling to americans. a lengthy investigation and multiple rounds of congressional testimony failed to produce a shred of evidence that special agent strzok s personal views ever affected his work. i know, harry, there are those out there who completely agree with it. i also know people say, hey, listen, those text messages were, at the very least, not nice. and they did know schhow he didt want donald trump to be president. doesn t that necessarily have to affect you in some way if you are in charge of an investigation? you know, i m not sure. everybody in the fbi, or so many of them, have their views. remember, katy, the same report says that there was a, quote, deep and visceral hatred among many in the fbi for hillary clinton, and in fact that s my sort of anecdotal experience as
actions with mr. gowdy. you got very angry in regards to the gold star father. that shows me that it s innately a part of you and a bias. he is a dentist. with me harry litman, a former u.s. attorney and former deputy assistant attorney attorney general under president clinton. peter strzok fired, are you surprised by that? yeah, i am. it reversed the recommendation of opr. that doesn t happen that much. candice will recommended a 60-day suspension and demotion and the deputy director overturned it and ordered him fired. look, everyone agrees, including strzok, that the texts he sent weren t smart, but there is no indication of any operational effect of them. they were, after all, private messages to another agent. so i thought that it was a
what trump said to me. we need to know what trump says trump said to him. it s the opposite of what use his little phrase a perjury trap. this is down the middle stuff. and, yes, after all this to say, oh, you know what? there was never a conversation at all? you wouldn t let a school boy get away with that. you know what would be helpful, harry? if there were tapes. exactly. i ll start with that. and your top of the story word, uhdspa. try to tell the truth about a not insignificant matter. that s the president again in ft. drum. he is going to be signing that military authorization bill in honor of john mccain, the man that he has denigrated so viciously over the past few years. what can you say? harry litman. thanks for having me. the president is going to continue watching all of these
pawing the stall. eager to smith to an interview, it is increasingly apparent that neither trump nor anyone in his orbit has any interest in answering mueller s questions. in a word, they are playing mueller and in the process playing the country. by the way, for our viewers, this is donald trump in ft. drum, new york. he is going to be signing that defense spending authorization bill in a little bit. just so you know what you are looking at. harry, go on with the op-ed. i want to raise the point, look, i would never second-guess mueller. i think he has known for some time, it s not a serious set of negotiations. he ll determine whae wants to do. the point about playing the country or the main thing i wanted to add with the op-ed, katy, we have a dual kind of investigation here by mueller. yes, we are looking at crimes and that s what we focus on, but we are also looking at what happened. he is really our only hope here. everything else is hopelessly politicized to give an account an