Page 4 - Megawatt Program News Today

They are on net this is what youre seeing on the bottom slide youre seeing at zero participation in the premium product full participation only in our standard product about 200,000 a year of net revenues well be able to invest in local construction or in Rate Stabilization efforts or other you know policy objectives but as the participation in the green product the darker green product grows the net revenues grow that is close to the one Million Dollars a with thirty megawatts of sales we expec...

Commissioner president caen thank you for your comments we would like to speak about the skweld schedule we hope youll say that. This is the time of the year. Great excellent and also were excited to see that the official notice is out in case you decided to approve the raised at our next meeting instead of the next meeting youre scheduled for. Thank you Enterprise Staff for doing that and making that possible to move that part of the schedule up and then also i wanted to speak a little bit to t...

Its just a very big different idea that would require a more risk and more money be borrowed by the city. There are two other assumptions i saw in there i wanted you to clarify if possible. One is didnt it also assume 100 enrollment over four years or Something Like that . It basically assumes about 2 66,000 to 267,000 account participants. And thats on an order magnitude of about 330,000 electric accounts. So, roughly all big commercial and all big residential consumers. And the other big assum...

Know, what renewable product consistent with state law. And, so, that would serve as the floor and you could exercise discretion beyond that as to what the mix would be. That would be how you could dial in the pricing that keep it affordable in a high wholesale price year. But its all those moving parts that we need to be managing under a scenario where we dont have a committed price like the shell project, with the shell approach. Umhm. Yes. If i could just go back to slide 5 just for a minute....

So, commercial customers pay only what commercial customers should be paying and residential customers pay only what residential customers should be paying because of the costs are divvied up. This model assumes that all the cost savings are socialized and that those cost savings which are predominantly generated by commercial customers are shared with residential customers. So, its not a good or bad policy, but its just a very different policy than what we get than in the past. So, one of the q...

That those cost savings which are predominantly generated by commercial customers are shared with residential customers. So, its not a good or bad policy, but its just a very different policy than what we get than in the past. So, one of the questions that we have posed to the contractors and also to others who have been involved in the Stakeholder Group is its a very large assumption to assume that private property commercial owners would be willing to or would want to share their savings with ...

Stakeholder group is its a very large assumption to assume that private property commercial owners would be willing to or would want to share their savings with residential customers because they could do many of the good things that are being proposed for Energy Efficiency and capture 100 of the savings for themselves or for their tenants. So, absent that, the model is hard to make the numbers work. And, so, one other assumption, too, i thought i saw in there was the exhetch hetchy power would ...

Not all sinks are the same. Not all Property Owners are the same. How you service that with a work force that is limited the number of trucks. That sort of thing. Its a very different proposal and thats the kind of thing i think youre working out and i dont want to rush into that. I do have two questions, though, that came out of the reading. One is that the two proposals are quite different in nature. Are we going to be asked to pick one or the other, or is there is this a phase a, phase b kind...

Set costs and rates by class, so, commercial customers pay only what commercial customers should be paying and residential customers pay only what residential customers should be paying because of the costs are divvied up. This model assumes that all the cost savings are socialized and that those cost savings which are predominantly generated by commercial customers are shared with residential customers. So, its not a good or bad policy, but its just a very different policy than what we get than...

Summer where we have 12 of the 15 kid that are willing and wanting to come back and the three that are not coming back, two of them are in college and the other is mainlying in architecture and so i am i want to make sure that i did highlight that and i know it was a Great Success and we look forward to working with the folks at p um, c and keeping ut in the loop and the community in the loop and i want to say thank you for your time. I think the youngest member of the commission has a passion f...