them weren t actually women. they were a lumpy looking dudes. g dudes.at was n athat was not e in fact, it waces a brilliant o piece of jujitsu. sun tzu could have written thato strategy here. you ha ad men who are clearl y craftier than they look somehowr convincing a whole lot of prairwise self-aware and highly educated women to praise themina as living paragonsra of thing abou womanhood. think about how hard itt howa would be to sell that proposition. i m going to steal your identity and then mock and degrade the immutable characteristics that define you as a person. then aand then as i do this, yoe going to smile brightlyd and th and applaud and then give a speech about how liberated you feel about that. the whole thing is amazing. ing isit s like watching a pracl joke devised by the drunkestby e most cynical fraternity brothers at the university of alabama during a hungoverty of u could pick to all in the breakfast. denny s, you can picture themdin all there.g spit and
live. i want to work. and of course l live. i want to work. and of course i want to help this club is much as ican. also coming up on sportsday. we meet the windsurfing six year old slicing through the waves in hampshire. welcome along, the first golf major of the year the masters is under way, the world s best are at augusta national, scotie scheffler got to wear the famous green jacket for the first time last year, tiger woods has won it five times, it s the only major rory mcilroy hasn t won. but this has become a tournament that s very difficult to predict, for the last ten years, we ve had a different winner every year, let s cross to augusta and speak to our co respondent andy swiss. andy, how s that leaderboard looking? andy, how s that leaderboard lookina? . andy, how s that leaderboard lookina? ~ ., ., andy, how s that leaderboard lookina? . ., ., , ., ,, looking? welcome to our gusto. still ve earl looking? welcome to our gusto. still very early days- looking? wel
presidential inauguration. at this crucial mile marker it s important to stare into the mirror of who we really are as a country. two years after lies and conspiracies about trump s big loss led to, quote, medieval combat on the steps of the u.s. capitol between law enforcement and trump supporters. those very same lies that inspired that attack two years ago are now deeply embedded in the politics of the gop. they are the single animating principle behind everything that happens in one of the country s two major political parties. it is in large part due to the fact that the man who, quote, summoned the mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame in the attack as january 6th select committee member liz cheney put it that would be twice impeached president trump himself as well as his top lieutenants remain the dominant force in the gop. and they insist on continuing to gaslight americans on what actually happened on january 6th to this day, to this hour on this day. just yeste
insurrection, a insurrection which the police welcomed the insurrectionists inside the building. we thought it was funny. what we didn t note, though, last night was the moment where that airhead reporter claimed that a police officer was killed by the mob that day. now, if you watch television, you ve heard that line so many times, so many times that you may not even notice when people say it anymore. they ve been saying it constantly for nearly two years. police officers were killed. many of them. why are they saying that? it s not true. it s proofbly a lie. it s in no sense accurate. no police officer was killed by the bythe mob on january 6th. anyone who thinks so, explain who was killed, what s that officer s name and how was he killed? we don t expect takers on that offer. the question is, why do they keep telling us that? there s a reason. there s always a reason. they re telling us likely so we won t ask too many questions the next time we read about another january 6
overturn the election results. that man is donald trump s top white house lawyer pat cipollone. he sat down for a transcribed interview under oath with investigators this morning. as far as we can tell, that interview or that meeting is ongoing at this hour. punch bowl news reports this about the parameters of today s testimony from cipollone, quote, sources tell us that the select committee does not have an agreement about what investigators can or cannot ask him. prior to hutchinson s testimony the panel had discussed an arrangement with cipollone for an on the record interview, but cipollone backed away from it, sources tell us. cipollone is expected to claim executive privilege over conversations he had with trump, but there is plenty that the committee is interested in outside of that category. for example, we expect cipollone will be asked about conversations with former white house chief of staff mark meadows. the possibility that cipollone could provide gamechanging i