Thats the way i interpreted it. I think its a really wonderful and amazing representation of his influence. Host janet in quincy, illinois, i think we have time to get you in. Caller thank you. My husband knew him. They worked together in 1958 the glacier park, montana. Guest you worked with whom . Host janet . Janet, i apologize. Im going interrupt you. Janet, i didnt understand who your understand worked with . Caller they were working in glacier park in a lodge in 1958. Host who . Caller hebert. Guest okay. Host janet, very quickly, go ahead. Caller anyway. We wanted to know. You had earlier talked about him being in this compound. Has anybody seen him . Is he okay . Thats my question. Guest yes. He came out recently for a funeral of a family member, and apparently talked to his brother. But then his brother told people about what hebert said. I think they cut off communication. But, you know, hes alive and hes healthy, apparently. But he has host is he being held prisoner . Guest y
They like to talk about the 20s our the 90s and sometimes it works. In the thirties you can do that but mostly it does not work or the 60 is. If you look back to the early 60s through 64 or the kennedy assassination, so much of daily life and popular culture, politics the way people dress seem like the 50s. With the 60s we think turmoil, urban riots riots, vietnam, rock concert its in dae became convinced of you should not talk about them where the sixties start which is what i have done. Did you feel your world change around do . A little bit. I started teaching 1964 and i was very busy preparing courses. We have assigned december 1964. I was not paying a lot of attention to what was going on but was impossible on a University Campus not to be aware of those that were developing a. Well not particularly severe they became that way in a couple of years and in march of 1965 arrival of indiana students begin to dress differently, much more concern of vietnam. Host when you saw the change
Understand, what is the question . So let me answer. Its a very simple answer. First of all of course as you can understand i want us to reach an agreement but i think we have to reach out in a sensible realistic way. One of the problems is that the piece thinking and peace concept will not renew in 20 years. This is what i think we need fresh thinking. You will not trite to a 25yearold chevy. So i think its time to thank fresh and to describe it in just a sentence. When israelis open their hearts and decided to go to peace in 1993 the result was a waive of terror and buses exploding in central jerusalem. When israelis took a giant step forward and the Peace Agreement in 2000 the result was the worst suicide bombing terror offensive ever. When the israelis opened their hearts the third time and we withdrew from the gaza strip and the result was rockets coming in life in southern jerusalem must awful. It is understandable why middleoftheroad realistic wellmeaning israelis are afraid the
Risk. And how we dont have a balanced system focus on competitive markets. Host is there can well go through some of this specific examples and a think everybody who talks she probably has their favorites here but to you, what was the most egregious . What stands out to you as being the most egregious and tell us a bit about it. Guest the most single agreed to star in the book is about a man named rob manning. Bob manning was a 26 yearold lineman for the electric Power Company in upstate new york, niagara mohawk. And one day in february 1962, as he was coming down off a powerful, able to electricity got loose and he went headfirst into the pen, paralyzed from the neck down. I met bob in 1997 when he called the New York Times looking for help because he couldnt collect his Workers Compensation benefits, 35 years later. But thats not the egregious story i tell in this book. The really egregious story is the Power Company was sold. The Insurance Company that had his claim which is owned b
Us your thoughts on our book club chat room, booktv. Org bookclub. I see it as a presumption that somehow, working with the right and leader. Sometimes you have to combat a narrative with a narrative. And the narrative is, Muslim Country and islamic country, and therefore global rules dont apply to us, nuclearweapons, we told americans we are not making nukes and kept getting buried but in this end, the nukes we said we were not making, at least we broke, if nothing else broke a promise, that can only be combated by a narrative. This review that we develop a personal relationship on the other side it will help, that is not new. Not the first to defend the head of the Pakistani Army and another admiral, and dubee mentioned in the book, and president eisenhower. The same phenomenon going repeatedly, meeting with the pakistani leader and admiral mullen in all sincerity worked hard, 26 meetings, in a lot of meetings. And general kearny was Pakistani Army chief was committed to eliminating