Page 89 - Michael Smith News Today

Service improvement north terminal and the proposed parking legislation requires no further Environmental Review and in the interest of my throat and your time i will not read through all of the traffic. Do you have a recommendation before we start . Yes, there is. This, as you know, is a a project that you and the Planning Commission and the board of supervisors approved. At the time of your approval we told you that we would come back for the legislation of the parking and traffic changes whic...

At city hall an officer actually doing Traffic Control protecting pedestrians why did that disappear and i think its very expensive to have a traffic light there and also make a lot of traffic backups but if you are not going to hire a Police Officer i think this is the next best thing unfortunately i think the officer should have been there on on that day when that woman crossed the crosswalk. Thank you. Second . Second. All in favor say aye. Before we do that a little break we have 3 fairly le...

In coordination with the paving project and down the road theres an opportunity for theres been discussion about potential temporary sidewalk widenings and bike lanes and all that can happen at the tail end of the paving project and thats kind of the plan going forward. Thank you im happy to make a motion to approve. Second. All in favor say aye. Next item. Item 13. The board will be also asked the proposed traffic legislation requires no further environmental review. While were bringing this up...

Released. Thank you. Our next item is item 8, another rehearing request. The subject property is [inaudible] 6th a. Avenue. The board received a letter from appellants with Planning Department approval decided november 19 2014 at that time the board voted 4 to zero to 1 to up hold the basis thats code compliant rear edition of a third floor 72 square foot deck and we will hear from the requesters first. Disclosure prior. Ive retained the firm rubin for a separate matter. I feel i can hear this c...

1 to up hold the basis thats code compliant rear edition of a third floor 72 square foot deck and we will hear from the requesters first. Disclosure prior. Ive retained the firm rubin for a separate matter. I feel i can hear this case with no bias or present. Prejudice. Thank you. Good evening. Were here tonight to give Additional Information to the board regarding extensive or costly attempted to negotiate with the project sponsors in good faith in order to myth mitigate some of the light into ...

We [inaudible] the survey so that make sure that nothing is go over the [inaudible]. So you all have a Merry Christmas and happy new year. Thank you john. Mr. Tigue. Good evening president lazarus and commissioners, corey tigue for Planning Department. We feel like this project was approved appropriately by Planning Department. Sounds like the proposed changes between the two parties would, if anything, result in a smaller project overall so wouldnt trigger any additional notification requiremen...

Costly attempted to negotiate with the project sponsors in good faith in order to myth mitigate some of the light into our home. The sponsors abruptly requested we give them modification ideas to address our concerns, but we were never given plans to study and refer to as had been promised in order to take informed suggestions. We then never had any response to the suggestions we had made as they left town for four month ts. We had great difficulty in obtained adequate plans in october. It was n...

It doesnt mean it could be worded that way. That could be requested and we may accept a bbn that requested that, but the language states we receive notification when we receive certain permits to notify those parties that we received this application. That application did not mention anything about using the bbn to be made aware of any specific decisions on a projebt and as was referenced we dont have a variance tracking system online. There is no public space where someone with track when a var...

H sfwloo for the appellants situation, but unfortunate will the code language is clear and ambiguous about the 18th month abandonment. It treats that like a non conforming use. When we have a non conforming use we have the abandonment clause its under the stipulation that space will be converted. The abandonment clausings have specific purposes and in this case it was very clear. The appellant flexibility within their licensing, but unfortunately the way the code works that doesnt exist in this ...

Two concrete foundations. Board or styrofoam. Not styrofoam. I would defer to inspector duffy on this, but somethings there. We dont know exactly what it is and how far it goes. Now we can hear from the appellants. Good eveninging commissioners. We have come a long way and my client is willing together put an end to this thing. We [inaudible] the survey so that make sure that nothing is go over the [inaudible]. So you all have a Merry Christmas and happy new year. Thank you john. Mr. Tigue. Good...