Page 54 - Migration Act News Today

Shaimaa khalil, bbc news. ive been speaking to mary crock, a law professor at the university of sydney. she says djokovic�*s lawyers have created a strong case. i have now been able to read the submissions put in on behalf of novak, and i think its going to be a very, very interesting case. hes got good lawyers and they seem to have made very interesting legal arguments that could well play out in his favour. so you think theres a chance he could make it to the australian open, but there are q...

The migration act and then policies that seem to be changing almost by the day coming out of an organisation called atagi, and so there will be very interesting questions about the status of all the different policies and, indeed, the ground that was relied upon by the decision maker to cancel the visa in the first place. and i think, for me, one of the interesting questions is, first, of course, what does the judge decide in terms of the legality of the cancellation? but the judge can either sa...

A chance he could make it to the australian open, but there are quite a few complications about this case, arent there, there seem to be lots of different sides, the state side, the federal side, and also the border force. look, the case thats been put to court is really based on very close reading of the actual migration law and i agree with you, i think the policies that apply, both at a state level and at a federal level are far from clear, youve got bio security legislation, youve got the mi...

That the delegate at the airport made a legal error. but fresh, hot off the press now, as the ministers lawyers make it clear that even if mr djokovic wins tomorrow, the court should not order his release, and that in fact the minister for home affairs reserves the right to make a further cancellation decision, he has not prevented from using other powers under the migration act to detain him. so it is very clear that the minister does not want mr djokovic in australia.- the minister does not wa...

Policies that apply, both at a state level and at a federer level are far from clear, youve got bio security legislation, youve got the migration act, youve got policies made out of the migration act and then policies that seem to be changing almost by the day coming out of an organisation called atagi, so there will be interesting questions about the status of all the different policies and, indeed, the ground that was relied upon by the decisionmaker to cancel the bees are in the first place. ...

The decision or rather the submissions by the ministers lawyers are quite dismissive of the grounds, they are saying he had plenty of time to respond to the notice intended to cancel his visa, the officer at the airport didnt do anything wrong, testing positive to covid was not a contraindication. in essence, they are trying to argue that the delegate at the airport made a legal error. but fresh, hot off the press now, as the ministers lawyers make it clear that even if mr djokovic wins tomorrow...

Ive been speaking to mary crock, a law professor at the university of sydney. she says djokovic�*s lawyers have created a strong case. i have now been able to read the submissions put in on behalf of novak, and i think its going to be a very, very interesting case. hes got good lawyers and they seem to have made very interesting legal arguments that could well play out in his favour. so you think theres a chance he could make it to the australian open, but there are quite a few complications a...

Have created a strong case. i have now been able to read the submissions put in on behalf of novak, and i think its going to be a very interesting case. hes got good lawyers and they seem to have made very interesting legal arguments that could well play out in his favour. so you think theres a chance he could make it to the australian open, but there are quite a few complications about this case, arent there, there seem to be lots of different sides, the state side, the federal side, and also t...

Thank you for talking to us, because it is pretty late at night where you are. anybody trying to follow it from this country is forgiven for thinking seems to be one version on one side, one version on the other, dont know who to believe. you are an immigration lawyer, we are fascinated to hear what you think is going on. fascinated to hear what you think is auoin on. , ~ , fascinated to hear what you think is auoin on. , g ., ,., going on. yes. my colleagues and i are obviously _ going on. yes....

Was up again, not party political but thats what you get on discretion. in but thats what you get on discretion.— but thats what you get on discretion. ., , , �* , ., discretion. in that sense its not ust his discretion. in that sense its not just his current _ discretion. in that sense its not just his current government. i just his current government. presumably there is a case of previous labour governments as well. look, i think since 2001 when the government started this border protecti...