information from its sources might provide stinger missiles which can take down aircraft to the ukrainian military, that would be a big plus for them if they came toe to toe with the russian military. whether or not the united states might provide helicopters that have been purchased to be used in afghanistan military helicopters and rather than not in afghanistan now, give them to the ukrainians. that would be a benefit for the ukrainian military. the british government is supporting the ukraine s navy. they are going to be helping them build two mine sweepers, eight missile vessels, and upgrading armaments on other ukrainian navy vessels. so there is, you know, broad support for a package of measures to make ukraine s military more robust. and all this rhetoric at the moment, is it simply that the rhetoric is designed to play on putin s mind? if there were in turks and caicos, there could be high
Украина и Великобритания расширяют военное сотрудничество в рамках операции ORBITAL
liga.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from liga.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Transcripts for MSNBC The Rachel Maddow Show 20200402 01:32:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
war-related purposes whatsoever. those 9,000 plus u.s. troops and the two destroyers and the two mine sweepers and the amphibious ships full of marines and the guided missile cruiser and the aircraft carrier, they re there to protect the free flow of commerce and navigation. nothing having i don t know what you re talking about with the iran stuff i don t know. navigation and commerce. the defense department declined to speculate today on what would happen if during the course of assuring the free flow of navigation and commerce u.s. personnel ended up intercepting iranian weapons on board the iranian ships steaming for them. would u.s. personnel on board any of the nine u.s. warships, would they board the iranian vessels if they thought they were iranian weapons on board and they wanted to stop the iranian weapons from getting to yemen.
military deployment is to protect the freedom of navigation and the free flow of commerce. there s a u.s. military presence in the gulf to ensure the frequent navigation and the free flow of commerce. what is it the freedom of commerce in the red sea? i wouldn t go beyond you know what we ve said about the need to protect the freedom of navigation. we re not there for anything you might have heard about trying to stop the iranian ships full of weapons. we re not there for any war-related purposes whatsoever. those 9,000 plus u.s. troops and the two destroyers and the two mine sweepers and the amphibious ships full of marines and the guided missile cruiser and the aircraft carrier, they re there to protect the free flow of commerce and navigation. nothing having i don t know what you re talking about with the iran stuff i don t know.