a day. because doty and avis believed amy was murdered in omaha, they asked city police for help. and the omaha police picked up liz on an unrelated misdemeanor crime. but in their interview, their questions were about cari liz stuck to her story that she was the victim in the strategy. what do you think happened to cari farver? i don t know now. i don t know what s amy s saying is true. i do not know. i m more scared that something is going to happen to me, and my kids won t have anybody. the omaha detective added some pressure. why, he asked, was her fingerprint in cari s car? i don t know. i ve never even been in her car. i don t even know what s harshly drives. she denied everything. you are just going to lie to
facility, and told doctors he was just getting. so i, mean, this is something that we are not recognizing an american law enforcement and mental health evaluation where these people are saying this, we re not stepping forward to take the right action. you know, we are not saying that it would take, you know, attorneys like harry and the great attorneys in justices in congress, to see if there is a way, that when someone threatens a shooting, it could be a misdemeanor terroristic threat, that would then disable your ability to own or possess or purchase a firearm. if you are convicted of a misdemeanor triumph domestic violence, for example, misdemeanor crime of domestic violence under laws of any state, you prohibited federally from ever buying a gun. you can go into a gun shop and buy a gun. we have these people saying they want to do mass shootings, but we never go the extra step, when we get through, they say they re getting, and anyway yeah, really quickly. it s really difficult
mass shooting. so, they hide behind these guys just trolling, just joking around, this is how we talk about stuff to get through stuff, you know? but about stthe buffalo shooter, si, a year before, had made a threat of mass shooting the police were called, and it was taken to a mental health facility, and he told the doctors he was just kidding. so, this is something that we are not recognizing in american law enforcement and mental health evaluation, that when these people are saying this we are not stepping forward to take the right action. we are not saying, and we ll take attorneys like harry and they re great attorneys of justice in congress, to see if there is a way. that when someone threatens a mass shooting, it could be a misdemeanor terroristic threat, that would then disable your ability to owner process a firearm. if you are convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence for example. under the law as many state, you are prohibited federally
mark meadows, dan scavino, even though the committee has said that they unquestionably, that s in quotes, no more than they said about trump s efforts to overturn the election. so, with that being the case, does that mean they won t charge former president, talk about why we re facing a double edged sword here, on the one hand you have a criminal prosecution that could further divide the country, the very polarizing, on the other hand people say they want accountability for what happened? i don t think we should read too much into the doj s decision not to indict mark meadows and dan scavino. all they announced, was that they wanted to indict those two men for the misdemeanor crime of contempt of congress. because they defy congressional subpoenas. two other individuals, who committed precisely the same crimes, steve madden and peter navarro, were indicted, why? because they didn t have any executive privilege claims, meadows is giving out being the