Page 105 - Misrepresentation News Today

Ought to. be the good thing there may be a limit but we havent reached it yet and i think this issue has been blown out of proportion because we did cope with the huge wave of immigrants in twenty fifteen or twenty sixteen. and dont forget that many of these people are war refugees wont be no longer taken more refugees. of course we should question its been said that everyone arriving in germany comes only to claim our benefits thats a complete misrepresentation and weve always contested just di...

Howie: why is there such a misrepresentation of a chunk of conservative opinion through the opinion media outlets. its not represented in much of the rest of the country its overwhelmingly represented here. hes a disruptive force not just for d.c., but for the conservative women as well. howie: thats it for this edition of "mediabuzz." check out-my podcast. mollie comes on one day a week. you can subscribe. lets continue the conversation on twitter @howardkurtz. i hope you will like my facebook ...

Howie: why is there such a misrepresentation of a chunk of conservative opinion through the opinion media outlets. its not represented in much of the rest of the country its overwhelmingly represented here. hes a disruptive force not just for d.c., but for the conservative women as well. howie: thats it for this edition of "mediabuzz." check out-my podcast. mollie comes on one day a week. you can subscribe. lets continue the conversation on twitter @howardkurtz. i hope you will like my facebook ...

Unsuitable for a judge. plus when he was confirmed in 2006 for his current position, there are a number of things that hes said that have turned out not to be accurate. he has claimed he wasnt involved over certain discussions over certain nominees, and yet he was. he claimed he didnt know about the stolen democratic records from the senate, and it turned out he received them. and so when you see that kind of misrepresentation then, and then you combine with all of the whoppers he told in his te...

Allegations, his discussion of temperament issues give you pause? >> it does if its a pattern. he was brought in to be kind of an attack dog against president clinton. that shows a very partisan presidential role thats unsuitable for a judge. plus when he was confirmed in 2006 for his current position, there are a number of things that hes said that have turned not to be accurate. he has claimed he wasnt involved over certain discussions over certain nominees, and yet he was. he claimed he didnt...

But the third thing is something ive written about, which is his assets. i literally when i heard judge kavanaugh, i thought that i was -- i thought i was just listening to him on the radio, and i thought he sounded like a talk show host. it was so inappropriate for a judge. and i think that that raises questions about whether not just the actual partiality, which we care about, but issues like the appearance of partiality. whats it going to be like when democrats, clinton or any other people he...

The actual partiality, which we care about, but issues like the appearance of partiality. whats it going to be like when democrats, clinton or any other people he attacked appear before him. its not just the acts and the misrepresentation, but also his affect and what he said. ive never heard a judge speak like that before. >> and joyce, theres some questions as well about the comprehensiveness of the fbi investigation right now. theres this letter from dr. christine blasey fords lawyers to the ...

That he said? well, thats not a legal standard. yes, it is. so, its certainly up for debate. and were going to do that right now. jennifer granholm and rick santorum. lets start with this vexing question for senators. if they are going to obsess on credibility, because you have jurisprudence, you have judicial philosophy, you have a lot of things you can base your decision on. but if its about credibility, jennifer, is lying about his habits in high school and college a material misrepresentatio...

White house. talk about it with experts. josh holmes, president trump laying down a line. saying if he lied, thats not acceptables does that concern you at all? >> not president trumps line. thats the law. right? you dont lie anywhere when talking to the federal judiciary committee in the senate? the house? saying, oh, thats movingal g t goal posts. >> now looking at whether or not he committed perjury, not being honest about drinking. mcconnells line. not mine. >> two extremely different things...

Philosophy, you have a lot of things you can base your decision on. but if its abiliout credibilit jennifer, is lying about his habits in high school and college a material misrepresentation of fact? >> its a really great question, chris. you talk about the legal standard, and there is that jury instruction, which everybody has been told about by now, false in uno, false in omnibus, if you lie in one thing, you can discount the credibility in other things. lie in something small, you can lie in ...