It was designed specifically do that whereas other poles around corner are lower and would not provide the necessary propagation. Kevin, i dont know if you can answer that. Basically im kevin moda swrks verizon. Verizon r. F. Engineer says i need a site at this intersection. We go to the intersection with architects. And look at different poles to see is it blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the site . Here we looked at this is the first pole we looked at. We thought it was the best location at that intersection because the antenna would be above where the windows were on adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet away from the rightofway. While the other poles on that street in the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the street starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal going west because of that. So that was kind of the reasoning behind this pole selection. What about placing it on buildings inst
Architects. And look at different poles to t blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the si . Here we looked at this is the fe we looked at. We thought it was the best locat that intersection because the aa would be above where the windown adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet m the rightofway. While the other poles on that sn the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the stt starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal goint because of that. So that was kind of the reasonid this pole selection. What about placing it on buis instead of poles . Its tough with the zoning in francisco. That is preference seven, the Pg Department can go to that. Its hard at the get these on residential lots. Residentialzoned properties, id say weve heard in past, residel properties could provide an alte to placing them on the pole if Comparable Service if the ses acceptable. We hear more of that from plannr would you like
Verizon r. F. Engineer says i nee at this intersection. We go to the intersection with architects. And look at different poles to t blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the si . Here we looked at this is the fe we looked at. We thought it was the best locat that intersection because the aa would be above where the windown adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet m the rightofway. While the other poles on that sn the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the stt starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal goint because of that. So that was kind of the reasonid this pole selection. What about placing it on buis instead of poles . Its tough with the zoning in francisco. That is preference seven, the Pg Department can go to that. Its hard at the get these on residential lots. Residentialzoned properties, id say weve heard in past, residel properties could provide an alte to placing them on the pole if Com
Notified the congress that they needed additional funds because the threat required over head cover for their temporary facilities. In 200 they contracted for temporary buildings that did not specify the need for overhead cover. Let me give an opportunity for miss muniz from your perspective on that question of not accepting all the standards and where youre at now. Sir the recommendation to have different standards for temporary structures has struck us as strange. We try there are different facilities . Well, the problem is that invariably when i have seen standards for temporary structures or interim facilities, its a lowering of the standard. What im afraid of is that we will by virtue of the fact that you a trailer is a trailer we will have lower levels of Security Standards for them, rather than striving to meet the real standard. An example is that for many years, all we had was construction trailers. Over the last several years we developed a heavily armored trailer that we can
Several votes on the house floor. You can see the chairman Jason Chaffetz is returning to the chair, and so we will see if the hearing gets underway shortly. Already today, several Opening Statements by the chair and rank ing member, and several of the witnesses. Jason chaffetz again is chairing the hearing, the top democrat on the committee is representative elijah cummings. Committee on the oversight government reform whether come back to order. Appreciate it. We were delayed for a moment, and more than a moment because of the votes on the floor, but i believe that now we are going to be hearing testimony from Inspector General roth. You are recognized now for five minutes. Thank you, chairman chaffetz and Ranking Member cummings and thank you for asking me to come here to testify in issues relating to tsa. The tsa programs fosters change and makes government better, however, the effectiveness of the oversight depends on making issue details and balanced public reports and looking at