Because there is no substitute thats a valuable by the time we move in, so i was personally satisfied. Good. Any other questions to our interim finance chair who did a great job. Although you have chaired in the past a joint conference. I just want you to remember. Strike that for the record. However, further questions on any of the contracts or we can move on to the next item. Item six is the consent calendar. Okay. In the consent calendar has on it our contracts report the three contracts that so weve already had a discussion. If somebody wants to eliminate again or i should say pull off of the consent calendar the calendars before us for voting and so all those in unless there is an extraction we will move on to vote. All those in favor say aye. Aye. All those opposed. So the consent calendar has been adopted. Thank you commissioners. Item 7 is the Health Care Service master plan consistency determination application review for healthright360. Its a mouthful. Good afternoon commissi
Department considers it inconsistent and deem its that way we would have a public hearing and you would make the determination. Thats an overview of the process. Now i will get into healthright360s specific application. Healthright360 is proposing to relocate two of its sites. The current site on mission to a new site at mission and van ness. It is two and three blocks away respectfully from the sites theyre relocate to the new site and expected to open in june of 2016 and will have 50,000 square feet. 30,000 is medical services. 10,000 is social services and 10,000 will be administration. Healthright360 has long been a partner of the department of Public Health so you may know some of the data already but they have a long history of providing care to low income and vulnerable populations in our city. As an example they provided information on their current Patient Population at their clinic at 1735 mission and in 2013 they served approximately 3,000 patients at that clinic. Nearly 70
From back east and europe to appear before the committee to answer questions that were generated because this was a significant amount of investment and we wanted to clarify and make sure that we all understood what in fact the parameters were and the projected outcomes and that and i am glad to see were still carrying that out. Director. If i may commissioners our Information Technology director mr. Kim acknowledged exactly what youre saying commissioner and had called Senior Leadership of siemens into the room to have that discussion and is completely confident that a candid discussion will yield better results this time. Thank you. Thank you. And i would say while the numbers are fairly large in the contracts which were recommending they are nothing compared to what we have to approve in the near future. And i think commissioner sanchez i could echo what commissioner singer was saying because weve all participated you and i in these same discussions and in this case our director has
And welcome to the special meeting of the joint city and School District select committee. First of all we would like to thank the staff at sfgtv that record our meetings and make the transcripts available on line. And a special thanks and our clerk today and are there any announcements . There are none. Thank you. And i will have a motion to excuse supervisor avalos who couldnt be here at todays meeting. We have a motion and i want to recognize that we have supervisor farrell as well as president fewer, commissioner wynns and commissioner norton and happy new and its great to be here and i am looking forward to chairing the process again this year. Madam clerk can you call the first item. Thank you. This is a hearing on the unified School District Surplus Property portfolio and sponsored by you. Thank you madam clerk. So this say hearing that our office had last year working with commissioner mendoza and i worked on many years ago at the board of education when we examined the list of
There is a perception in the community and in the city that we have lots and lots of empty buildings, and the reality is thats simply not true. Currently there are only three sites with structures that are vacant and not in use. 200 middle point road, 1950 mission and the former site on 42nd avenue. We only own two sites with no buildings on it, seventh and loton and on connecticut so part of the message that the School District is trying to get out to the community, particularly for instance from Charter Schools who think we have an abundance of empty buildings we actually have vibrant School Communities in the buildings and even if the population of those schools is lower we have expanding special needs, expanding child care, we have prek and programs filling up these classrooms. For those of you that ausknow the Education Code makes it hard to sell School Property and thats on proper because in the 50s and the 60s School Boards popped up and we can have a fire sale and raise money a