Drivers are on those t nc reside service apps and drivers are being asked to share the vehicles with other drivers this this is completely against what the cpc decided it has to be a perm vehicle not a vehicle for commercial purposes thats exactly what those vehicles are. They went into business and the ceo said were the first cab company for cab schaffer they didnt have a permit its against the law let me read you about they make our insures go out and get the policies but theres no members to inform and insure us theyll be driver for the ride sources, however, when the chronicle interviewed them they asked their last names not be used because it will jeopardizes their Insurance Company with the cab keypads. So here we have the head of the company thats admitting in the San Francisco chronicle to insurance fraud. This the brazilian beyond belief the only reap theyre getting away with it the Ride Services thought they could get away with it two years ago the city did nothing. They were
Leave the room. Please be advised that cellphone interference will cause. Item 5, citizens advisory report. I do not see mr. Weaver here. This morning we have three items. We are going to call them all at once. The question was raised earlier about the ability of this body to proceed because of an appeal filed yesterday afternoon of the Planning Commissions decision. My understanding from the City Attorney until that is registered from the board of supervisors for 30 days. So we are able to act this morning . Chairman, nolan, the answer is yes you can up until an appeal is cal endared by the board of supervisors. You can take action. Great. Call the items. City clerk item 6 6. Approval of the transit effectiveness project, including a Service Policy framework and, at a programmatic and conceptual level, the Service Improvements, servicerelated capital improvements, and travel time reduction proposals, including a transit preferential streets toolkit described in the final Environmental
Projected events and parking usage assuming or pending a bcdc permit amendment. Variances from the base case or this break even scenario shows the projected income lost to the port as shown in exhibit e, low calls, that is, less than 82 calls per year will result in a net loss to the port. Likewise, high calls or over 82 calls a year will generate greater revenue to the port. So, in conclusion, port staff will present to the Port Commission consideration of this Management Agreement as early as may 27th. We believe that this agreement represents a balanced approach of generating revenue while setting aside the needs of the terminal operation. And well conclude a 20 year adventure to deliver a new cruise terminal to the city and county of San Francisco. Port Commission Approval is crucial in that it will allow metro to begin the transition from primary operations at pier 35 to the new terminal at pier 27. Again, pier 27 will be a modern facility that meets industry standards such as a m
Electronic devices are prohibited. Any person responsible for one going off in the meeting maybe asked to leave the room. Please be advised that cellphone interference will cause. Item 5, citizens advisory report. I do not see mr. Weaver here. This morning we have three items. We are going to call them all at once. The question was raised earlier about the ability of this body to proceed because of an appeal filed yesterday afternoon of the Planning Commissions decision. My understanding from the City Attorney until that is registered from the board of supervisors for 30 days. So we are able to act this morning . Chairman, nolan, the answer is yes you can up until an appeal is cal endared by the board of supervisors. You can take action. Great. Call the items. City clerk item 6 6. Approval of the transit effectiveness project, including a Service Policy framework and, at a programmatic and conceptual level, the Service Improvements, servicerelated capital improvements, and travel time
Windmill replacement facility and well rebuild those once our west side recycled Water Project gets approved and part of that phase two construction would include one mile of pipeline. The central pump station well facility shown on this figure is located west of the existing central pump station which is the main Irrigation Pump station for Golden Gate Park. And that pump station is located within the wood waste and composting area in the park. This is almost in the center of Golden Gate Park. The total building high is 1900. This facility will include connections from our we well to the pump station and it will allow the use of the system in case of an emergency. Once recycled water comes in as the Irrigation Water supply, this facility would allow back up for that recycled water system as well. This is a view of the landscape plan for the central pump station well facility. Landscaping would include a low berm and some trees and slubs to better screen the facility from public views