we are the only one that is working with a rothamsted model to signal when you would choose to do that. but it s a particular test case. it is a chemical which decimates bee populations, vital to bee pollination. to non flowering crops. yes, but the point is, still, these chemicals enter the water system. they are very difficult to break down. in europe, they have absolutely decided the right thing to do is to ban them. i am just interested that the farmers union, while saying it is utterly committed to getting to net zero and being a sustainable, responsible custodian of the environment, still supports using this chemical. it s the wrong message, isn t it? you are not actually right about europe. france has not used the modelling process on the neonicotinoids for sugar beet. they have not modelled and they have been able to get derogations to use it, as have other countries. for us, we havejust got the precision breeding bill through, which will be a game changer, but are we really g
anixonoids, we would lead to the world in sustainable production of sugarbeet and the neonicotinoids is being used with non flowering crops with the bottom step model. it is with non- flowering crops with the bottom step model.- the bottom step model. it is a chemical which the bottom step model. it is a chemical which decimates - the bottom step model. it is a chemical which decimates be l chemical which decimates be population is vital to be pollination. population is vital to be ollination. ., ., ., pollination. two nonflowering cro s. pollination. two nonflowering crops- with pollination. two nonflowering crops. with the pollination. two nonflowering crops. with the point - pollination. two nonflowering crops. with the point is - crops. with the point is chemicals crops. with the point is chemicals into - crops. with the point is chemicals into the - crops. with the point is| chemicals into the water system. they are very difficult to break down. in europe they have abso
is being used now in non flowering crops. we are the only one that is working with a rothamsted model to signal when you would choose to do that. but it s a particular test case. it is a chemical which decimates bee populations, vital to bee pollination. to non flowering crops. yes, but the point is, still, these chemicals enter the water system. they are very difficult to break down. in europe, they have absolutely decided the right thing to do is to ban them. i am just interested that the farmers union, while saying it is utterly committed to getting to net zero and being a sustainable, responsible custodian of the environment, still supports using this chemical. it s the wrong message, isn t it? you are not actually right about europe. france has not used the modelling process on the neonicotinoids for sugar beet. they have not modelled and they have been able to get derogations to use it, as have other countries. for us, we havejust got the precision breeding bill through, which w