AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
When it comes to gun rights, there are many prominent conservative women who do not suffer fools gladly. Two of them are Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and conservative talk show host Dana Loesch.
Despite the hate-filled threats and derogatory, often misogynistic bile that is thrown their way, both of them routinely speak truth to power regarding the Second Amendment and are not shy about correcting the rather large amount of media/Democrat misinformation that frequently gets spewed in the aftermath of mass shootings and gun control pushes by the left.
Such was the case earlier this week once President Biden took steps to implement the gun control agenda he promised as a candidate for president, first by nominating a very strange person to lead the ATF, and next by signing a series of executive orders under the guise of wanting to prevent future mass shooting incidents.
Of course, I’ll address the whole “well-regulated” bit later today, but for now, we just need to understand that this individual does indeed mean regulation as the term is currently known. It should be noted that she’s far from alone in this argument, either. I’m not using this tweet to direct attention to her, but to the argument itself.
So, let’s see if uteruses are somehow more regulated than guns.
Well, for one thing, no woman I know of has had to undergo a background check for a uterus. In fact, known felons are free to have a uterus and aren’t imprisoned for the possession of one.