Union Square Community about the impact that this organization has had in union square within a part of town that sees some of the most densely traveled and densely parking situations that we have in the city. So, with that, colleagues, ask for your support for this and we will proceed. Great. I assume, colleagues, that we need a roll call on this. We can have a roll call, madam chair. On item 16, supervisor cohen . Cohen aye. Supervisor farrell . Farrell aye. Supervisor kim . Kim aye. Supervisor mar . Mar aye. Supervisor wiener . Wiener aye. Supervisor yee . Yee aye. Supervisor avalos . Avalos no. Supervisor breed . Breed aye. Supervisor campos . Campos aye. President chiu . Chiu aye. Supervisor chu . Chu no. There are 9 ayes and 2 nos. The resolution is adopted. Item 17. Item 17 is a resolution retroactively approving the boarding area f Specialty Store lease between Avila Retail Development and management, llc, and the city and county of San Francisco, acting by and through its Airp
Supervisor breed . Breed present. Supervisor campos . Campos present. President chiu . Present. Supervisor chu . Chu present. Supervisor cohen . Cohen present. Supervisor farrell . Farrell present. Supervisor kim . Kim absent. Supervisor mar . Mar absent. Supervisor wiener . Wiener present. Supervisor yee . Yee present. Mr. President , there is a quorum. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, could you please join us in the pledge of allegiance . I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic for which it stands; one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Colleagues, we have copies of the january 15th, 2013 Board Meeting minutes. Could i have a motion to approve those anixctionv motion by supervisor campos, seconded by supervisor farrell. Without objection, those minutes are approved. Madam clerk, any communications . I have no communications, mr. President. And could you read our Consent Agenda items 1 through 12 . Mr. Presiden
A place where we are seeing the parking, all parking garages be managed centrally by the mta. This may not be the time because there may not be another structure in which we are able to engage the community to be involved, but i do think that its important at least to signal that. And, so, i just wanted to explain my vote. I hope that there will be some more information that is forthcoming that really proves and shows the benefit of both of the organizational structures. I believe that that information is out there. I just think that that probably has not been brought to light. And, so, without that information at this moment im not able to support it. So, just wanted to explain that. But thank you very much for reaching out and sharing with me your comments. I verb appreciate it. Supervisor avalos. Thank you. I will be pretty much echoing the comments of supervisor carmen chu. I do want to thank people for coming here and expressing their interest and keeping the current structure for
For years African Americans and japanese americans Property Owners were pushed out of the Western Addition fillmore area and japantown neighborhoods. This corporation comprised of Business Owners and leaders in the community has served as a check against the injustice, a voice for the neighborhoods. That voice is far too important, too valuable to silence it now in the name of cost savings. More over, i am not convinced that eliminating the corporation would actually generate savings. The corporation acts as [speaker not understood] for the japantown and fillmore communities thus increasing the number of visitors to the area and paid customers to the garage. The increases the garage the garages top line revenue. And without the nonprofit corporation, the mta would have to manage the garage, which would certainly require some similar expenditures. So, any potential savings are, at best, illdefined. I want to thank my good friend sandy maury for her hard work in japantown overall and esp
And that is for monies that would cover unavoidable or already incurred costs. And then the balance of 3,580,4 61 which is shown in table 6 on page 36 of our report, we consider that to be a policy matter only because the board determines the priorities of what should be expended from the city state Revenue Reserve lost fund. So, our recommendation are on the bottom of page 36. We recommend that you amend the ordinance to delete the Human Service agencies, appropriation for inhouse supported Services Administration and reduce a million 114,76 total requested appropriation by 581,300. That would reflect revised total of 5 34,0 06 remaining for the department of Public Health. And we recommend that you amendedth proposed ordinance on page 2 to reduce ,169,175 offsetting appropriation from state loss Revenue Reserve by the same 580,300 to 6,589,585. And our second recommendation is to amend the ordinance on page 2 to delete the 1,800,000 source of funding for the children with families co