Page 4 - Moot Point News Today

Whole case is pending on the idea of whether or notulo valuations that by the way, you have a disclaimer, the trump organization had a disclaimerisclaime, use their valuations. >> any company lending moneythe any company giving insurance. they have a fiduciary responsibility insur to do thei. valuation. so its a moot point. theres not a single personag thats been agreed in this case. you have no complaint from anyse anybody, no lender, no insurance company. i mean, its absurd on facetheyw that w...

It based on whos dangerous and whos not. theyre going to determine it based on what narratives they want to push forwar b on wd versus what narratives they dont want to see push forward. so think its a great standardat if that was what they were actually going to do. and i believe they were capable ofthey werg to. but i. unfortunately. all right. speak some sense. these left losers. >> lets lets go one, but lets go down the checklist first for that. theyre not going to change the name of the tow...

Featuring every kind of guitar hero – from old-school to cutting‑edge. And not one but two Van Halens…

In large parts if we�*d stayed in the european union. now, he didn�*t win that election, so it�*s academic. it�*s a moot point, but also the idea that you can�*t have nationalisation, de facto nationalisation, of train and rail networks across europe is obviously nonsense, because it is de facto nationalised in italy, in france, in germany. it�*s subject to liberalisation. so, you must allow competitors into that industry. and that�*s true of all of the public sector industries... ...

Them if you don�*t want to. it�*s the government that is repealing them, not the fact that we left the european union. the government, or a government, can go further than the laws we�*ve got now, if they wish, because now they�*re sovereign. what we believe the european union was about, and the question of principle on which we made our decision, is the fact that privatisation seems to be, to us, to be a constitutional matter now in the european union. they call it liberalisation, and t...

They�*re sovereign. what we believe the european union was about, and the question of principle on which we made our decision, is the fact that privatisation seems to be, to us, to be a constitutional matter now in the european union. they call it liberalisation, and the railways all over europe are now having to open themselves up to competition. we believe that would have gone into the health service and further into education and all our public sector. the difference between privatisations ...

It�*s a moot point, but also the idea that you can�*t have nationalisation, de facto nationalisation, of train and rail networks across europe is obviously nonsense, because it is de facto nationalised in italy, in france, in germany. it�*s subject to liberalisation. so, you must allow competitors into that industry. and that�*s true of all of the public sector industries... i�*m going to interrupt... ..under the four freedoms. a couple more issues before we end, we�*ve hardly any ti...

If they wish, because now they�*re sovereign. what we believe the european union was about, and the question of principle on which we made our decision, is the fact that privatisation seems to be, to us, to be a constitutional matter now in the european union. they call it liberalisation, and the railways all over europe are now having to open themselves up to competition. we believe that would have gone into the health service and further into education and all our public sector. the differen...

But you just argued for it. >> no, im not in favor of it. >> if a bill came forward to privatize social security you would vote for it? >> no. >> then its a moot point. you just explained that the -- would be better returned -- so you are privatizing it? okay. >> dont cheat that hybridization. >> your for it. okay, you are for it. you are for it. >> advertising social security has long been a goal of the right and a major one for the tea party. here is republican senator mike lee back in 2010. >...

Privatize social security, you would be for it? >> what we should be doing -- >> its a moot point. >> its not a moot point. youre trying to put words in my mouth. >> you just explained that the s&p 500 would be a better return than social security. so then youre for privatizing it. >> thats a fact. dont cheapen privatization when the data is crystal clear that the returns would have been better. >> youre for it. >> that means it would have been a better situation. >> lets go into some of the oth...