all eyes have been on the delaware courtroom where fox news trial was slated to begin today, this very monday. the jury had been chosen the judge had set today for this actual trial to begin. but if you can see where i m going with this, the trial did not begin today. in a last-minute development that has been noticed everywhere from washington, d.c., where so many politicians have a symbiotic relation with fox to fox headquarters in midtown manhattan, they re noticing the big news i have for you right now in the biggest case about the lies that led us into the insurrection the judge has delayed this for at least a day and that may sound like a small scheduling matter until you hear why. this day, this pause right now tonight that we re living through is one last legal chance for fox to fold, to settle what could be a very costly case, to try to quietly lose rather than potentially loudly lose before the trial actually begins. and when a trial like this begins, as you may kno
can i throw someone in prison? yes. can someone go to jail? can someone get fined? so many questions we are joined by lynnsia johns welcome back welcome back thanks for having me. there are different ways to measure the 100 days as a matter of math, this speaker has a narrower margin because of democracy republicans did underperform on the one hand, that reflects a public that was really pushing towards democrats in many cases. i don t like it in the media when we overpersonalize it it s not that mccarthy could be so weak or terrible, but also, he doesn t have a lot of votes to play with i m curious how you think that reflects in what hasn t so far been a lot of legislative achievements yeah, you make a really good point in distinction in how many votes he nazi the house compared
trump s is longer than usual because he was creditly accused and facing evidence of threatening the court system and the judge. to be clear, murdoch hasn t been accused of threatening violence against the judge. but going on the stand would take a lot longer than arraignment. if fox doesn t settle, murdoch and others may be on the stand facing new legal jeopardy if they lie it s a forum where fox does not control the mic and the audio or the message and the visuals. the bubble would be very seriously breached it s also an unpredictable process where if fox were to lose, and they could win but if they were to lose, a jury would then be the one deciding in the end how much fox pays right now if they settle, they have some say on thatify f they can reach a deal i showed you the deal. in public, the judge is not saying exactly why the trial was delayed. and the voting machine company that is suing fox says it stands by the demand for damages of