Page 49 - Murkowski News Today

Find new and even more creative ways to tear one another down. its got to end. this is not who we are. >> so, alex, thats lisa murkowski pushing back against a process that both senators have essential seen as a circus, now what we want confirmation politics to look like. well see this come to a conclusion in about four hours. >> can i ask you to clarify something? its expected that lisa murkowski will use the word "present" not actually cast her vote. is that to counter steve daines, because he...

If you vote for kavanaugh will a number of women be upset in your district? probably. looking at the demos in maine and alaska, these two republicans are who you have to look for. its likely theyre going to be okay. sadly, remember, we dont have enough women in office for women to go back like collins and murkowski, jeff flake is leaving. unless he wants to run in 2020, he has nothing to lose politically. i told you about manchin and highcamp. one other note about joe. yes probably plays better ...

Senator -- >> sean: will that vote be the indicator? >> it will be because -- low, that is -- historically, every time you have the vote, that is the indicator. if you vote to move forward, it is essentially a vote for the nominee. it historically, as well, that usually meant you made it we haa final vote. i would wager democrats are going to try to prolong it as long as they can so their protesters can keep going. >> sean: productions, kimberly, what do you say? >> im hopeful, i think, that he ...

Neededan every one of the 51 remaining republicans. murkowski and collins were two of t the three. now the senate is slated to convene tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. and by rule the procedural vote is at 10:30 a.m. if the senate invokes cloture, they have 30 hours max. if theyho take all of the 30 hos that puts them to about 5:00 p.m. for the vote. >> are you covering the protest tomorrow? >> if you need to wear a bike helmet, some sort of protective gear tomorrow. and we will be right back with ...

Any corroboration on any of these charges, i dont believe it is profiling courage for these four senators to say he has had a 40 year track record version 17 days of smears. everybody else that seems to have known him and know him say just the opposite. are they going to give into these tactics? because if they do, i would argue america is forever changed for the worst. >> i hope that three of the four will actually get there. im not so sure about murkowski. i have to tell you, that kavanaugh fa...

Investigation has been comprehensive, and senator mendez said this is a shame, and i think he used a different word in private, but i think she is yes. i think the wildcard isly s lis murkowski. those are state politics that are definitely going to play into her decision. >> of course republicans can lose one vote and get this across the finish line, but there has been an expectation that murkowski and collins will stick together. collins was 90% yes before all of this, and yesterday three went ...

Vote. >> the motion is agreed to. >> kavanaughs supreme court nomination passed a hurdle morning. collins, flake and joe manchin voted yes. murkowski joined with democrats to vote no. the senate majority leader said lawmakers wont be intimidated by mob rule. >> you wont have the final say around here. the senate will have the final say. >> his rhetorical sparring partner on the democratic said the gop had a failed nominee. >> let them look back on this chapter as a shameful end of the scorched e...

Here, right? were not hearing a lot from her camp and there was some really interesting reporting in anchorage. he talked to some of these women saying she believed murkowski was going to be a no and another who said she thinks murkowski is closer to a no. how different is the calculation for lisa murkowski versus senator collins as they are looking at that vote and what it means? >> i think its actually very different. im actually from alaska, so i know a lot about lisa murkowski. and she has a...

>> it looks to be a product of an incomplete investigation that was limited, perhaps by the white house. >> it was not intended to get to the bottom of this. it was not intended to find the truth. it was intended to be a cover. a cover for those who dont want to look at the truth. >> heres the problem for the democrats, you should have known that when you agreed to the deal, it was always going to come out this way. where are we now? the same place we were before. its not about any of the people...

Presumption of innocence? that is their question tonight. do they believe in due process, the rule of law? to they have common sense and decency? do they believe that you have to have some corroboration? do they believe in our great constitution? or are they going to reward forever the slanderous tactics of the hard left that only want power? here with reaction, fox news investigative reporter sara carter, the author of the deep state, how an army of bureaucrats protected obama and working to de...