Page 60 - Murky News Today

Classified information is whether someone willfully and knowingly mishandled classified information. from this "new york times" article and all of our reporting, we dont know that that is the case. but that will be up for the fbi to decide. >> and mark, the clinton camp is already responding to the report. what are they saying? >> the same they have put out and from my colleague andrea mitchell is this comes down to a disagreement between the state department and the intelligence community on wh...

Day one. first order of business. get some jerk chicken. can you blame me? no, i think not. ♪ oh, thats good. yeah, yeah, i know this routine, believe me. its brown, its murky, and it burns, mommy, it burns. and there are still all these years later, two jamaicas. theres the jamaica that most

>> treating her as a hostile witness? >> i think. what the clinton campaign wants to avoid is what happened last time. so much hostility, it was toxic. its incumbent upon her that she look successful. dont forget voters look at you and judge you whether you look authentic and real and jeb bush is showcasing his ability to take questions from anybody and not get ruffled, at least from ordinary people. sometimes he gets ruffled -- >> yeah. the contrast with jeb bush who takes questions from report...

Witness? >> i think so. they want to avoid so much hostility between the campaign and the press it was toxic. now it is inscum -- incumbent to have a successful campaign that she look ream rather than looking like she is ducking every question. jeb bush is make a point of this showcasing the ability to take questions from anyone and not be ruffled. at least by ordinary people. >> but contrasted with jeb bush who takes the questions at almost every stop or every day really that is striking contra...

Witness? >> i think. what the clinton campaign wants to avoid is what happened last time. so much hostility, it was toxic. its incumbent upon her that she look successful. dont forget voters look at you and judge you whether you look authentic and real and jeb bush is showcasing his ability to take questions from anybody and not get ruffled, at least from ordinary people. sometimes he gets ruffled -- >> yeah. the contrast with jeb bush who takes questions from reporters at almost every stop or a...

You cut a head off, there will be a hundred more. everyone in these organizations when it comes to leadership is replacement. were going to have to wait and see what impact this has, if any, on the organization. >> yeah. i was going to say, this comes on the heels of all those reports that the ahead of isis, al baghdadi may or may not have been injured in a strike and that his number two in command may or may not have taken on more in the control of the organization. but it all seems very moistu...

Especially since they are all high-risk targets? >> reporter: well this organization is fairly diffuse so the roles are a little murky. yes, they would be shared among different members of the leadership. just in case one person got taken out, youd have somebody else to carry it on. but this was about getting the kind of intelligence that leads to future raids that starts degrading the network. one of the officials i spoke to said that this is just a continuation of the coalition strategy to shr...

Really have no idea isnt that basically correct? >> the ability of government to follow it on open social media is often murky. people in different agencies have different understandings of what theyre legally allowed to do when it comes to monitoring the communications of americans on open media social platforms. and thats something where a clarification would be very helpful. >> we can see with isis the massive impact these accounts have had. the amount of people who have been drawn to the syr...

She chose to create a separate server, her own brand really of e-mail where she does it all on her own and thats what she decided to do. where is the wrong, the right, the murky, the what here what is the story and why does it persist? >> well it persists because of politics primarily. but lets go back to the 2009 rule that you just referenced. it was a much broader rule that governed the maintenance of e-mail accounts in 2009. it was very fuzzy language. it says that people in state department ...

Aol, but she had her own. it was a clinton something or other. does that mean you can always get that -- when you said you can keep it on your own e-mail but it had to be retrievable. if it retrievable? can you delete delete delete whenever you want? >> as a public official she should never delete delete she has to keep everything just for posteritys sake, for herself. this rule is kind of murky. what she should have done if there was e-mail from a private server she should have forwarded it to ...