Page 50 - Muzzle News Today

With the story that george zimmerman told. one of the things that medical examiners do is try to reconstruct the events and his determination of distance between muzzle and hoody, the hoody garment and the body is -- and the fact that the -- trayvon martin was carrying this juice can in the pocket of the hoody, you put that all together and its very consistent with trayvon martin straddling over george zimmerman and george zimmerman shooting with his right hand with the bullet entering slightly ...

Impressed with the testimony, especially when you compare it to the other medical examiner for the state? >> it was quite different. dr. bao gave a very amateurish presentation, flip-flopping on certain facts. i think all these questions were cleared up by what i call textbook testimony today by dr. di maio. he covered everything by both medical examiners, not only the distance between the muzzle of the gun and the clothing and the body. he also talked about time of death, consciousness and pain...

To four inches away from the skin. so the barrel of the gun was against the clothing. the muzzle of the gun was against the clothing. the clothing itself had to be two to four inches away from the body. at the time mr. martin was shot. the most important point is the nature of the defect in the clothing and the power. if you lean over somebody, you would notice that the clothing tends to fall away from the chest. if instead youre lying on your back and somebody shoots you. the clothing is going ...

Is it does seem to continue to make george zimmermans story plausible that trayvon martin spoke. >> i think all of the physical evidence that we heard about from dr. demayo is consistent with the story that george zimmerman told. one of the things that medical examiners do is try to reconstruct the events and his determination of distance between muzzle and hoody, the hoody garment and the body is -- and the fact that the -- trayvon martin was carrying this juice can in the pocket of the hoody, ...

Theories but one is consistent with guilt and one for innocence, boom, you must adopt the one that goes to innocence and find the defendant not guilty. thats the definition of reasonable doubt. >> you were impressed with the testimony, especially when you compare it to the other medical examiner for the state. >> it was quite different. dr. baio gave a very amateurish presentation, flip-flopping on certain facts. i think all these questions were cleared up by what i call textbook testimony today...

I am bill oreilly, please remember that the someone stops right here. we are definitely looking out for you. welcome to hannity tonight. we have developments in all the days highlights. defense attorney mark omara revealed today that the defense has a few more witnesses to call. he hopes to rest his case tomorrow. if that happens, this trial could come to an end before the week is over. the major revelation from today is the testimony of forensic pathologist dr. vincent de mayo. take a look at...

Veteran prosecutor. lets take a look at how dr. di maio describes how the gun was in relation to trayvon martins body. >> its my opinion that the muzzle of the gun in this case was two to four inches away from the skin. so the barrel of the gun was against the clothing, the muzzle of the gun was against the clothing, but the clothing itself had to be two to four inches away from the body at the time mr. martin was shot. >> now, according to di maio, thats consistent with zimmermans account that ...

And good evening, everyone. im erin burnett. is the zimmerman case finally case closed? so george zimmermans lawyer said today that hes done. hes resting his case tomorrow. i mean, some people thought this trial would go on and on, but it has been anything but that. and there is a good chance that jur george zimmerman will never take the stand in his own defense. now this could be why. a noted pathologist took the stand today and said that according to how he has looked at the evidence it suppor...

The photographs show contact discharge of a weapon against the clothing. and this i agree 100% with the firearms examiner. at the time of the discharge, the gun was against the clothing, the gas came out, tore the clothing, theres a defect and tears from it, theres a deposit of suit all around it. so what you know is that the muzzle was in contact with the clothing at the time of discharge. and again, this is what the firearms examiner said, and also, i believe, did some experiments proving that...

>> lets talk for a moment about the mechanics of that shot, putting together the defect on the clothing, thats a result of contact with the muzzle, that you believe that the distance between the clothing and skin was somewhere between 2 and 4 inches, not in contact. your understanding of mr. zimmermans statement, because of the video reenactment, your work, essentially, or your task was to determine whether the medical evidence was consistent with what mr. zimmerman said happened. is that -- >> ...