documents are no longer in the white house, or that they were transported to mar-a-lago. it's also that there was a whole lot of intervening circumstances where the actual government was saying we'd like these back. the archives, we know that you have something. please return them, and was able to actually delineate certain things that were there. so if there was a moment in time where documents were where they were not supposed to be, they came after a subpoena. and knowing that there was a subpoena active to try to retain and return these documents, documents were moved. documents were put from one place to another in some effort to try to conceal documents where they're existing or to keep them out of the rightful hands of the owner, well, then that now thickens the plot here. so any cooperating witness, although the identity we do not know. i don't want to get ahead of my skis, the fact that you have somebody who might have insight into what happened once there was actual notice given that documents were knowingly on that
the archives, we know that you have something, please return them. and was able to actually delineate certain things that were there. so, if there was a moment in time where documents were one, where they were not supposed to be, they came after a subpoena, and knowing that there was a subpoena, after they tried to retain and return these documents, documents removed, documents were put from one place to another in some effort to try to conceal documents. or their existence or to keep them out of the rightful hands of the owner. well, that now thickens the plot here. any cooperating witness, although the identity we do not yet know, i don't wanna get ahead of my skis, the fact that you have somebody who might have some insight as to what happened once there was actual notice given that documents were knowingly on that premises and were not returned? what happened in the interim? that is the heart of jack smith's case.
indictment along with probably the greatest freudian slip ever. you handed him the nomination. at the same time -- i don't know. i don't want to get out ahead of my skis. there's a lot of time here. everything he's said to people about they're not coming for you, they're coming or the me because i'm in the way, now you look at this tonight and you're like yeah, that kind of sounds right to me. you're going to break 200 years of u.s. precedent about indicting your political opponents? over a business records charge that happened seven years ago? with a woman named stormy daniels? that's what you got? that's what you're going to do? you're going to roll with that. >> they're going to do that. jessica, who was setting next to me, the way i saw what she said, she said this felt too powerful. it felt strong and not that she enjoyed the strength of indicting a former president, i
him. i don't remember if! started ellin: at him. i don't remember if! started yelling at him _ him. i don't remember if! started yelling at him while _ him. i don't remember if! started yelling at him while i _ him. i don't remember if! started yelling at him while i was - him. i don't remember if! started yelling at him while i was on the l yelling at him while i was on the ground — yelling at him while i was on the ground i— yelling at him while i was on the ground. i remember pushing away because _ ground. i remember pushing away because i— ground. i remember pushing away because i was very upset and it was still very— because i was very upset and it was still very strange to me what had happened. and i pushed down the hill and i turned around and i yelled at hint _ and i turned around and i yelled at him. , , ., and i turned around and i yelled at him. ,. . , ., and i turned around and i yelled at him. ,. . ,., him. did you scream before you went down? i him. did you scream before you went down? i don't — him. did you scream before you went down? i don't think _ him. did you scream before you went down? i don't think so. _ him. did you scream before you went down? i don't think so. 0k. - him. did you scream before you went down? i don't think so. ok. so, - down? i don't think so. ok. so, if others heard _ down? i don't think so. ok. so, if others heard a _ down? i don't think so. ok. so, if others heard a scream, _ down? i don't think so. ok. so, if others heard a scream, that - down? i don't think so. ok. so, if. others heard a scream, that wasn't you? others heard a scream, that wasn't ou? ., ., ~ others heard a scream, that wasn't ou? ., ., . , you? know, i froze. when he slid in between my — you? know, i froze. when he slid in between my skis, _ you? know, i froze. when he slid in between my skis, i _ you? know, i froze. when he slid in between my skis, i absolutely - you? know, i froze. when he slid in| between my skis, i absolutely froze, and i_ between my skis, i absolutely froze, and i don't _ between my skis, i absolutely froze, and i don't remember yelling or screaming — and i don't remember yelling or screaming until i was very angry at what _ screaming until i was very angry at what had _ screaming until i was very angry at what had happened. so, screaming until i was very angry at what had happened.— screaming until i was very angry at what had happened. so, you guys were on the ground. — what had happened. so, you guys were on the ground, and _ what had happened. so, you guys were on the ground, and then _ what had happened. so, you guys were on the ground, and then you _ what had happened. so, you guys were on the ground, and then you said - what had happened. so, you guys were on the ground, and then you said to - on the ground, and then you said to him, you don't know if you were up first on the ground, but he was still on the ground.— first on the ground, but he was still on the ground. yes. and you said, still on the ground. yes. and you said. what _ still on the ground. yes. and you said, what are _ still on the ground. yes. and you said, what are you _ still on the ground. yes. and you
work addressing the anti-trust provisions with big tech? >> as i mentioned, i'm interested in these issues and would like to have them fully ventilated at the department with the anti-trust division and also with outside experts so i can have a better understanding. i do want to say, however, that i'm going to be recusing myself from at&t because -- >> thyime warner. >> yeah, because now time warner is part of at&t. ie i was told under the rules that will carry over to at&t. until i talk to the ethicsed advisers at department, i don't want to get too far ahead of my skis, but as a general policy matter, i want to get into this area because i think it's on a lot of people's minds and how
aren't the only heroes coming home from iraq. coming up, a heart-breaking and inspiring story of love and dedication. the four-legged soldier who is healing thanks to a couple who lost their own son in war. >> there is new developments in the case of an american man believe to be murdered on the border with u.s. and mexico. tiffany says she was forced to leave her husband's body behind and run for her life after the couple came under gunfire. we are learning that there may be two suspects in the case that mexican authorities have. brand new information next. >> what that moment was like, the moment you had to let him go? >> awful. because i knew i had to leave him in mexico waters and there was -- i couldn't get him up. i have couldn't get him on my skis. it couldn't help him -- i couldn't help him. ♪ i was young