we ve taken a government office, we ve insulated it from all government influence, all influence of the the american s can give it. we ve given that the power of lawmaker, a law enforcer, and line interpreter. that s not right. that is one of the reasons why mick mulvaney is the guy that we need a heading the agency. i would worry about president trump s decision to put anyone in there if that person were saying, there is nothing wrong with the cfpb, nothing wrong with his unbridled discretion. historically, it has been reserved for despots. shannon: despots, wow. those are strong words. a lot of people are saying that it s a lot like scott pruitt, a frequent epa credit, lawsuits, legal battles, that kind of thing, and helping appointed to. they seat as a pattern by the president to put someone in there who wants to destroy an agency. that he doesn t like her or his administration thinks it is in of a taxpayer. may be that that is his point of view but if their point of view is tha