process and the nape nature of the punishment. it was a perfectly beautiful call. i think the president s allies are very excited about sondland testifying because the president has relied on a number of things that commonsense tells you shouldn t be as much as they are. he keeps relying on the fact that the president zelensky said there s no pressure. we know victims of extortion in the presence of the extortionist on whom they still rely in front of the cameras sometimes deny the same might be true with sondland. he gets asked a question. i think it s crazy if we re conditioning this on that. five hours go by and sondland writes back i think you mischaracterized the position of the president s efforts.
picasso did a wonderful portrait of his mistress at the time, which was entitled, woman in an arm chair but through sim bltz ask it isn t until you look very deeply into the picture that you see exactly how he has created that sexuality. it is an extraordinary painting. it is one that we just restored at the met and i was at the museum yesterday and there were crowds of people around it, discussing, debating the nape nature of the work and that s exactly what we do at the met. we stimulate that debate. could the met have mapped a collection of this size without this donation? i m sorry, i didn t hear you? could the met have this kind of display without this kind of donation? no. it wouldn t have at all. i mean, this kind of art is extraordinarily unique.