he went there, his father went there. jamie: relevant to the case, since you re taking this case seriously, that the father paid this money over a period of time. he didn t just rely on one payment at the table, the napkin didn t come one way the check another. it was over time. so did the school reinforce their suggestion they take the student by doing it again and again? what a wonderful point, jamie. yeah, because at the time, his kid was in the fifth grade. so he wasn t eligible to go. so every year he s paying 10,000 and it s a tough economy. he had to borrow money to make these payments, but he loved and supported it. his father went there. jamie: but the school had something to say about it. let me put it up there if i can. they say while it is the school policy not to comment on pending litigation, this suit is for real, folks. strake jesuit, they kept their admissions process separate from contributions. they will argue, the director