or more on car insurance. rchts developing tonight, fresh fallout surrounding the converse yal law. it will bully bill forces pregnancy centers to provide their clients with information about public program that is offers access to abortions. shannon breem in washington with the story. megy, n, california is telling family planning clinics that they must provide patients with information about how they can go about getting an abortion. even if it s in direct conflict with the full purpose.
if that s true, would you support a law mandating information on family planning and where you can go for adoption options. and would you be okay if you think more information is better with a mandate that the abortion clinics have to tell the women what their fetus looks like before they abort it? and what will happen during the abortion procedure? licensed clinics already actually adhere to this law. they ve provided options about information about options from adoption to pre-natal care to legally accessible abortion. elyse, it s before this law. planned parenthood and abortion hold on. planned parenthood and abortion facilities, their focus of abortion over 90% of pregnant women are going to end up having an abortion. their focus is abortion. it is a full-on assault on the freedom of speech and is forcing pro-lifers to be posting abortion ad.
if that s true, would you support a law mandating information on family planning and where you can go for adoption options. and would you be okay if you think more information is better with a mandate that the abortion clinics have to tell the women what their fetus looks like before they abort it? and what will happen during the abortion procedure? licensed clinics already actually adhere to this law. they ve provided options about information about options from adoption to pre-natal care to legally accessible abortion. elyse, it s before this law. planned parenthood and abortion hold on. planned parenthood and abortion facilities, their focus of abortion over 90% of pregnant women are going to end up having an abortion. their focus is abortion. it is a full-on assault on the freedom of speech and is forcing pro-lifers to be posting abortion ad. where is it going to stop?
is california going to force churches or pro-life families or catholic schools to post abortion notices everywhere? this is an extremely sick law. as i said, this is not about freedom of speech. it s not about freedom to worship however anyone chooses to worship. what it is about is setting a threshold to offer to their candidates. i would ask lrksz yla what she s so threatened of. what this is about, elyse, is it s about abortion facilities, the neighboring lobby, your lobby, national federation for abortion clinics, nas about abortion numbers. that s why naral is gerns every abortion regulation and restriction.
the requirement undermines their entire mission and forces them to contra diblgt their own viewpoints. they argue that california has no legitimate compelling government interest enforcing pro-life groups to give patients information about abortion. the first amendment protects the freedom of speech. it also protects your freedom not to have the government force you to speak the government s message in favor of abortion. we reached out to governor jerry brown s office for comment. we wanted to ask him about why there isn t any exception for faith-based or pro-life clinics. his office said his signature on the bill speaks for itself. critics who don t come ply face a first-time fine of $500 and each time after that, the fine jumps to a thousand dollars. the lawsuit names both governor