The private sector. Why would a team not want their team expose the product, the brand exposed to tens of thousands of people . So, we think that the blackout rule is obsolete and the fcc took the first move and they will vote, finally at the end of this year but we believe theyll follow suit. It tries to address concerns over carriage rules, over retransmission consent, basically giving people a level footing when it comes to being able to negotiate with broadcast and being able to negotiate with the providers and the people who are trying the delivery. Trying to deliver that media. To the consumer, so, it puts people on a level Playing Field when it comes to those kinds of negotiations. Republican representative bob latta from ohio, new York Democratic representative Brian Higgins and colorado republican representative cory gardener, monday night at 8 00 eastern ton the communicators on cspan2. On july 26th, 1947, president truman signed a National Security act. It established the Na
Today a 62 to 36 but was passed on the keystone pipeline. How Speaker John Boehner read the statement that we hope president obama will drop his threat to veto this commonsense bill that would strengthen Energy Security and create thousands and thousands of good new paying american jobs. More reaction to the senate votes available on our website at cspan. Org. Former secretary of state Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright and George Shultz testified to the Senate Armed Services committee hearing. They discussed the Russia Ukraine conflict and the Islamic State. The beginning of the hearing is interrupted by protesters calling Henry Kissinger a war criminal. John mccain chairs this twohour hearing. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] new paragraphs [chanting loudly] nuke aircraft [chanting loudly] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [in
And what if this is public debate in education. But we must understand is that the yarn will be determined by the quality of the questions that we ask. American military power has and will continue to play a role in upholding, restraining him at destabilizing rivalries and providing a field for Economic Growth in International Trade to follow. It is a sense of basic security that a strong and consistent american political presence provides and has made possible many of the Great Strides of the third world era. It is even more important today. The United States has pointed out they should have a strategy, not a budget driven strategy. And in that context attention must be given to the modernization of our forces. America has played a role as stabilize their and it is a vision for the future. And all great ideas and achievements before they become a reality. I would like to thank you mr. Chairman mr. Ranking member for conduct team hearings. I am happy to answer your questions. Thank you
Is under the previous regime in ukraine because of the significant amount of corruption that took place in all the agencies of government, what took place inside the yo Ukraine Military is outrageous in terms of the capabilities they used to have and no longer have. They are a mere shadow of their former selves. While i know some of their desires, i dont know the entire list of what they want. Nor do i. I have no idea what the laundry list is or what make sense. I would caution, again, whatever we decide to do here will be effective or not in large measure based on what the people in ukraine do and what they do is going to be based on the confidence they have in the leadership that has been abysmal up to now. Im not sure where they are. We could dump stuff in there all day long and probably not be successful. Understanding what is really going on in that country at the political level is really the prerequisite. Admiral, i would like to ask you on a different area and the premise of my
What needs to be lifted and what doesnt . I believe the process is that weve gone to all the agencies who are relevant to these documents and asked for a review. But mr. Higgins said they lifted some of the redactions. Yes, and we as well in an agreement with the committee several months ago also agreed with the committees desire to have minimal redactions. And so we went back over these 40,000 documents and minimized the redactions. You know, there was an outside group prior to this committee being formed that had a freedom of information act and got some information. I believe it was from the state department, with no redactions. And as a member of the intel committee, we had gotten the same information redacted. Now, would it be easier for this committee or to have better information if we go through the freedom of information act rather than requesting it from yall . Well, my understanding is that we receive 18,000 foya we received 18,000 foya requests last calendar year. They got