please spurs the nonsense talk about executive privilege rejected now by a report that has looked at it. this is america. there s no executive privilege here for the presidents, much less treat advisers, the plot crews unorganized insurrections against the peoples government and the peoples constitution and then to cover up the evidence of their crimes. the courts aren t buying it, and neither are we. navarro insists only on adding insult to his contempt. more than a year after biden beat trump by more than 7 million votes, navarro continues to spread the big lie. trump won and he says quote, be on any shadow of a doubt this election was stolen. he brags about his work with steve bannon to apply pressure on vice president pence to do the wrong thing. he tells the complete story in his book in trump time, and in his three part report, which was made up of titles like, the immaculate deception, and the art of the steel.
spilling the beans. we had over 100 congressmen and senators on capitol hill, ready to implement peter navarro. the boss tells pence to take my freaking call. navarro tells rolling stone it was about sending the boat back. most or all of those dates were decertified how do you expect people to take seriously your claim that this is secret and privileged when you went out there talking about it and when you and ban and said the committee s dog wouldn t bark? they were afraid of you and the report. it seems now like the dog has parked. thank you. he has so much knowledge to share with the journalists, but he refuses to share that knowledge in response to a lawful subpoena. evidently, mr. navarro is only concerned with elective privilege with keeping certain matters confidential when it s
scavino and former trump advisor peter navarro in contempt after both men refused to comply with committee subpoenas. those referrals her head to the house and then to the department of justice where the attorney general merrick garland will be left to decide on whether to criminally indict the two men. chief legal correspondent for msnbc and host of the beat with already. ari, video of your interviews with peter navarro were shown in that committee hearing. part of the reason that was done was to basically tear apart mr. navarro s defense, that somehow these correspondence, these documents, are shielded by executives privilege. tell us why it s meaningful that pirro navarro went on your program to talk about what role he played with mr. trump in the january 6th insurrection? it was striking. you and i were sitting there. we don t know where they re going to introduce. the report that came out there
most fundamentally, neither the incumbent nor the former president has asserted privilege regarding mr. navarro s testimony or document production to the committee. and mr. navarro has no unilateral authority to assert privilege himself. beyond that foundational flaw, his privilege claim, since the election, he has spoken and written widely above the precise subjects that are the focus of our subpoena. clearly, mr. navarro is eager to tell his story as he sees it, so long as he can do so on his own terms. for example, in 2020 and in 2021, mr. navarro published a three-part report on his website called, the navarro report. in it, he makes allegations about election fraud that have been debunked. furthermore, in 2021, mr. navarro published a book called, in trump time. he described in detail actions he took to change the outcome of the election. for instance, mr. navarro claims credit for working with
january 6th will repeat itself. thank, you mister chairman. i yield back. the lady yields back. i know call a report on the resolution, recommending that the house of representatives, peter cain navarro and danny scavino junior in contempt of congress or refusal to comply with subpoenas duly issued by the select committee to investigate the january 6th attack on the united states capitol. a report was circulated in advance including copies that are available. the clerk shall designate the report. report on the resolution recommending that the house representatives find peter cain navarro and daniel scavino junior in contempt of congress for refusal to comply with subpoenas duly issued by the select committee to investigate the january 6th attack on the