If Shakespeare were a technology fiction writer, he likely would have come up with something that looked very much like the story of the Fairchild F8 and Mostek 3870 microcontrollers. It’s a story full of misplaced trust, corporate seduction, shifting loyalties, misadventure, misappropriation, legal machinations, and great success followed by oblivion. A truly Shakespearean tale…
and separated from the rocket. surely duke was one of the team members of the control center he kept in touch with the astronauts on their mission. the enthusiasm for space was building but we were in the space race with the russians so that motivated us to commit to it. there was a tense moment 4 days into the mission when armstrong and aldrin flew towards the moon again and again the radio cut out. then the navigation computer sounded the alarm neil armstrong took control and landed the lunar module gently on the moon s surface. with neil. through the eagle has landed very excitedly
but we were behind in the space race with the russians so that motivated the u.s. to commit to it. there was a tense moment 4 days into the mission when armstrong and aldrin flew towards the moon again and again the radio cut out. then the navigation computer sounded the alarm neil armstrong took control and landed the lunar module gently on the moon s surface. what made your. way through the eagle has landed very excitedly asa roger toy for a week i ll be on the grill you got a bunch of guys about blueberry that buzz aldrin filmed armstrong setting foot on the moon along with his historic words.
subsequent right and left turns following standard navigation waypoin waypoints. from an investigative perspective, what that suggests is that those navigation waypoints were entered into the flight management system, which is the navigation computer of the entire aircraft. so it looks like human hands, whether pilot or passenger. no one knows. but if it was by human hands, why go south? what is in that direction but a lot of ocean? there is nothing, other than australia in that direction. and the area that we have been pinpointing for the search, there is very, very little there, a few atolls. so it doesn t make sense then. oh, it makes no sense at all. considering the pilot s history of security breeches, allowing passengers into the cockpit, it does leave open the scenario, the hypothetical, that a mentally disturbed passenger or
sure about that. there s no motive for the pilots. china reporting that none of its passengers and that was the majority of passengers, more than 150 out of 239 people aboard the flight they say nobody s got a link to terrorism. this list has been cleared. this manifest has been cleared in the past by intelligence agencies. where does that leave us? it leaves us right back at catastrophic failure, and the question, did the pilot program the onboard navigation system to take him closer to an airport where he could have brought that plane down after some kind of catastrophic failure? why didn t he do it? we don t know. fire in the cockpit, any other kinds of problems that might have happened on board there. those are still unanswered questions that can t be answered until we retrieve the flight data recorder. back to you, john. all right, jim clancy in kuala lumpur. jim mentioned right there this new report that the flight s computer, the navigation computer, was programmed to take