burden on our entrepreneurs. so these entrepreneurs can open new businesses expand existing ones and create jobs for these people so they can leave poverty, not just feel more comfortable living in it. we need to point out it may not be 109 million americans. it s 109 million beneficiaries. that doesn t mean there aren t a lot of people who legitimately need it. i completely agree with michelle. that we need to be doing more to encourage people to get back to work to be entrepreneurs. mobility is the number one issue in this country. it s not actually income inequality it s inequality of opportunity. is there an john i thought that was against the law to have inequality of opportunity. the only equality is equality in front of the law. once again, this idea of people are in need. need is not the standard of value. if juan wants to help anyone they more than have the right to. simply because you have the need doesn t mean americans have the obligation to cough up their tax
your point is it s too complicated? it is a moral issue here wayne. if you want to help those in need start a kick starter for them. pass around a collection plate. that s the moral problem here. the sense you have to help someone in need just because you re alive and you have the money to help them. no you should have no wrong, wrong. go ahead, wayne. wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. you re making it a moral problem. it s not a moral problem. it s the fact that the federal government doesn t know what the hell they re doing. they can t find their tushey from first base. does it bother anyone 109 million americans, that s one-third of all americans, are recipients of some aid, one form of aid or another? isn t this outrageous? well i think this is the result of a liberal agenda. liberals don t care about lifting people out of poverty. instead, they re focused on making people feel more comfortable living in poverty. let s reduce the regulatory
propaganda war? the u.s. is good at this. we could be dumping pamphlets over there, like educating by dropping pamphlets? no you can educate pea, you can educate they re running a propaganda war here. let me ask, should we bring american ground troops? there s no winning the war over there. why kill more americans. let arab ground troops go in. what do you say? he has no set policy. he s dealing with situation politics here. situation, military operations. something happens and he reacts to that. he has no set policy. they have no strategy. there is no strategy. until he gets one, until he understands this is a war between shiites on the one hand and sunnis on the other hand then he s not going to understand how to deal with it. you didn t answer the question. what should we do with ground
these people might not be able to sustain themselves and their families. we also talk about 1,600 families, 2,700 children. those are real americans we need to make sure are going to be okay. what about it is arizona being too harsh as jessica says? i wouldn t use the term harsh. i don t think arizona is going far enough. the point isn t to make sure people are working, the point is do you get rid of welfare. that s the issue. the issue isn t really should you give money to someone in need. the real issue is do you have the right not to give money to someone in need. do you have to give every time jessica or juan or anyone else says these people really deserve your help? the whole idea of america is you own your own life. if you want to help someone, that s great, but you re not a slave to everyone else s endless needs in this free country. so juan many states most states have a five-year limit on food stamp recipients. texas has a tiered system.