investigation, during the ukraine investigation, essentially, acting as defense counselor for donald trump. it s going to happen again. on the question of subpoenas, there s a mostly set of facts here. scott perry got a subpoena which he denied. he is now promising subpoenas of his own. you ve been on this program before, talking about the need to increase the enforceability of congressional subpoenas. it was with the power of subpoenas playing out. it is congressional subpoenas without. there is no realize asian of the hypocrisy what to do, and that s a challenge on his face which is, we have to point out the falsehood of this equivalence. democrats conducted investigations, of things like
happen again. on the question of subpoenas, there s a mostly set of facts here. scott perry got a subpoena which he denied. he is now promising subpoenas of his own. you ve been on this program before, talking about the need to increase the enforceability of congressional subpoenas. it was with the power of subpoenas playing out. it is congressional subpoenas without. there is no realize asian of the hypocrisy what to do, and that s a challenge on his face which is, we have to point out the falsehood of this equivalence. democrats conducted investigations, of things like january 6th. it justified republicans engaging in vexatious litigations, over oversights, and harassments, in the biden ministration. endless hearings about hunter biden s laptop, for no example. we were attacked on january six. there was multiple lines for the election and, it is not the same thing is what republicans are about to do. it will be
TimesLIVE spoke to attorney Siphile Buthelezi about the legal basis of the letter of demand he sent on behalf of clients to the department of public enterprises and Eskom.
the price, and once integrate loyal in tax law there is a moment where mostly tax law is a penalty for noncompliant. whether the judiciary was writing this abo justice, somebody in the corner might have said, how do we enforce, it was the enforceability? and i m sure the consensus is you do not need that, no supreme court justice would ever dare take on the public image of violating a law like this. well, if that is what they thought, they were being pretty naive. in the tax contest that you were involved in, although there are penalties, it really is the reluctance who people who violate the law who account for a lot of its clients. people stop at stop signs, they do not run red lights even if there are cops around. only a tiny percent of people are audited, the compliance rate is pretty high, and you would think that at the apex of the judicial system, the ethical restraints would be self enforcing. it turns, out they are not.
it was the enforceability? and i m sure the consensus is you do not need that, no supreme court justice would ever dare take on the public image of violating a law like this. well, if that is what they thought, they were being pretty naive. in the tax context that you were involved in, although there are penalties, it really is the reluctance who people who violate the law who account for a lot of its compliance. people stop at stop signs, they do not run red lights even if there are cops around. only a tiny percent of people are audited, the compliance rate is pretty high, and you would think that at the apex of the judicial system, the ethical restraints would be self enforcing. it turns, out they are not. the ultimate solution is to have better justices and not to sublet the kinds of people who, on occasion, we have put on the court. harvard law professor laurence tribe, thank you very much for joining us once again tonight. thank you, lawrence. coming up, senator raphael