📰 Ninja Operating News
Ninja Operating News Today
Fast, Ad-Free News Updates
Stay updated with breaking news from Ninja Operating. Real-time updates on events, politics, business and more.
February 2, 2024
Investigations pursuant to section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) determine “whether there is unfair competition in the...
November 7, 2023
"Steam MOP Market Research Report by Arizton"North America held the most substantial global steam mop market share and held a share of approximately 37% in 2022.Arizton’s latest research report states that the
January 4, 2023
2022 has proven to be an interesting year at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) and the National Advertising Division (NAD). Below is a roundup of some of the highlights...
June 14, 2022
/PRNewswire/ -- The Law Offices of Jason Turchin announces the filing of a burn injury lawsuit against SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC and KOHLS, INC. on behalf of a...
June 14, 2022
/PRNewswire/ -- The Law Offices of Jason Turchin announces the filing of a burn injury lawsuit against SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC and KOHLS, INC. on behalf of a...
March 11, 2022
In 2021, Fintiv continued to be one of the hottest and most controversial issues facing the patent bar. The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) precedential Fintiv decision...
January 14, 2021
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (Patent Office) designated new Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) precedents protecting patent owners from multiple inter partes review (IPR) challenges. The Board decisions included one that concerned the identification of a real party in interest (RPI) and when multiple petitions challenging the same patent are not permitted. In RPX Corp. v. Applications in Internet Time, LLC, 1 the Board hel...
December 31, 2020
[co-author: Chris Hodge*] In a recently designated precedential decision, the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) considered challenges to claims covering autonomous robotic cleaning devices. inter partes review over 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2) challenges by the patent owner. In its institution discussion, the PTAB determined that it does not need to resolve a dispute regarding a possible real party-in-interest (“RPI”) if the determination would not impact its institution decision. The...